SEC - Page 50

3440 result(s) found.

CoinGecko Launches Index Tracking Top Alleged Securities Coins Classified by SEC

CoinGecko has recently introduced a new index, the “Top Alleged Securities Coins,” which tracks the largest crypto tokens perceived as securities by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

This index organizes the selection of crypto assets based on their market capitalization.

Topping the list is BNB with a market cap of $243, followed by Cardano (ADA) at $0.292, Solana (SOL) at $23, and TRON (TRX) at $0.0765.

A spokesperson from CoinGecko informed Cointelegraph that the index was launched in early August.

It was created by compiling a list of the most prominent tokens that the SEC had classified as securities in previous legal battles.

Although the SEC currently identifies 68 tokens as securities in recent lawsuits against crypto exchange giants Coinbase and Binance, CoinGecko’s index lists only 24 of them.

According to CoinGecko’s data, the top tokens included in the SEC’s litigated remit account for approximately $84.9 billion of the entire crypto market, which represents around 7.5% of the total crypto market capitalization of $1.21 trillion.

SEC Chair Gary Gensler has been assertive in stating that the majority of crypto assets should be considered securities.

READ MORE: Elon Musk’s X Pledges to Fund Legal Bills for Users Mistreated by Employers over Social Media Activity

He previously expressed that “everything other than Bitcoin” falls under the SEC’s regulatory purview.

If Gensler’s stance is upheld, it would imply that nearly all of the approximately 25,500 cryptocurrencies listed on CoinMarketCap’s platform would come under the SEC’s regulation.

As regulatory scrutiny intensifies in the crypto space, CoinGecko’s new index sheds light on the tokens considered as securities by the SEC.

This development also raises concerns among crypto enthusiasts and market participants about the potential implications of broader regulation on the industry.

While the SEC aims to protect investors and ensure market integrity, the evolving regulatory landscape poses challenges and uncertainties for crypto projects and investors alike.

Market participants will closely monitor how this space evolves and how it impacts the future of cryptocurrencies as a whole.

Other Stories:

Coinbase CEO Affirms Commitment to US Amid Regulatory Uncertainty

U.S. Senators Call for Crackdown on North Korea’s Cryptocurrency Funding of Nuclear Program

Latvia Sees Decline in Crypto Asset Purchases Amidst Concerns Over Fraud and Money Laundering

Chamber of Digital Commerce Releases Report on SEC vs Ripple Ruling

/

On August 1, the Chamber of Digital Commerce (CDC), a prominent blockchain and digital assets advocacy organization in the United States, released a detailed report focusing on the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) lawsuit against Ripple.

The report, titled “SEC v. Ripple Ruling: Impact and Analysis,” thoroughly analyzes the case’s outcome and highlights its significant implications for the future of the cryptocurrency industry.

One crucial aspect of Judge Analisa Torres’s ruling, as outlined in the report, is the establishment of a crucial precedent that distinguishes between an investment contract and the underlying asset.

The report delves into Torres’s classification of Ripple’s XRP token distributions into three distinct categories: institutional sales, programmatic sales, and other distributions.

By applying the Howey test, the judge sought to determine whether these distributions constituted an offer and sale of investment contracts.

The CDC expressed its contentment with the ruling, which was in line with their amicus brief supporting Ripple. Perianne Boring, the CEO, and founder of the CDC emphasized the ruling’s importance in setting a precedent for future legal encounters within the crypto industry.

She underscored the significance of establishing a balanced playing field in the digital asset sector and the organization’s dedication to advocating for policies that support the United States’ leadership in the digital economy.

READ MORE: Chamber of Digital Commerce Publishes Impactful Analysis on SEC’s Ripple Lawsuit

However, while the ruling was seen as a positive step towards logical crypto regulations, the CDC firmly believes that definitive regulatory clarity can only be achieved through effective legislation enacted by Congress.

The CDC acknowledged the introduction of several blockchain and digital asset regulatory bills in both the U.S. House and Senate.

However, the report also expressed uncertainty about the potential enactment of these bills, mainly due to constraints posed by the legislative calendar.

Despite the challenges, the CDC remains committed to advocating for a comprehensive legal framework for digital assets.

Such a framework would create a conducive environment for digital asset product launches and foster innovation in the crypto industry.

In a previous instance, the CDC accused the SEC of overstepping its authority and unfairly labeling crypto assets as securities in its insider trading case against former Coinbase employees.

In conclusion, the CDC’s report on the SEC’s lawsuit against Ripple sheds light on the significance of the ruling’s impact on the cryptocurrency industry.

The report emphasizes the need for a balanced regulatory environment and effective legislation to bring about clarity in the digital asset sector.

The CDC continues to play a vital role in advocating for a comprehensive legal framework that supports innovation and growth in the burgeoning world of digital assets.

Other Stories:

JPEG’d DeFi Protocol Recovers $10 Million in Stolen Crypto After Hacker Returns Funds

Bitcoin’s Hodl Strategy Outperforms Crypto Funds by 68.8% in H1 2023

Elon Musk Puts Rumors to Rest: X Has No Plans to Launch Crypto Tokens

Chamber of Digital Commerce Publishes Impactful Analysis on SEC’s Ripple Lawsuit

/

The Chamber of Digital Commerce (CDC), a prominent U.S. blockchain and digital assets advocacy organization, recently released a detailed analysis of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) lawsuit against Ripple.

The report, titled “SEC v. Ripple Ruling: Impact and Analysis,” delves into the implications of the case’s verdict and its potential consequences for the cryptocurrency industry.

One crucial aspect highlighted in the report is Judge Analisa Torres’s ruling, which establishes a significant precedent by differentiating between an investment contract and the underlying asset.

Specifically, the report focuses on Judge Torres’s categorization of Ripple’s XRP token distributions into three distinct classes: institutional sales, programmatic sales, and other distributions.

By applying the Howey test, she determined whether these distributions constituted an offer and sale of investment contracts.

The CDC expressed its contentment with the ruling, as it aligned with the organization’s amicus brief supporting Ripple.

Perianne Boring, the CDC’s founder and CEO, emphasized the ruling’s importance in laying the groundwork for future legal encounters within the crypto industry.

Boring stressed the need for a level playing field in the digital asset sector and reiterated the group’s commitment to advocating policies that support the United States’ leadership in the digital economy.

While Judge Torres’s ruling was a positive step towards rational crypto regulations, the CDC firmly believes that definitive regulatory clarity can only be achieved through effective legislation by Congress.

The report acknowledges that various blockchain and digital asset regulatory bills have been introduced in both the U.S. House and Senate.

READ MORE: Bitcoin to Breach $100,000 by 2024 Amidst Mining Industry Challenges

However, the CDC expressed uncertainty about the actual enactment of these bills, largely due to constraints posed by the legislative calendar.

Despite these challenges, the CDC remains steadfast in its advocacy for a comprehensive legal framework for digital assets, aiming to create an environment conducive to digital asset product launches.

It is worth noting that in February, the CDC accused the SEC of exceeding its authority and unfairly classifying crypto assets as securities in its insider trading case against former Coinbase employees.

This incident further underscores the importance of clear and well-defined regulations in the cryptocurrency space.

In conclusion, the CDC’s comprehensive report on the SEC’s lawsuit against Ripple sheds light on critical legal distinctions and potential implications for the crypto industry.

The organization remains committed to advocating for clear and effective legislation to provide certainty and support the growth of the digital asset sector in the United States.

Other Stories:

Binance-Backed Solv Protocol Raises $6M in New Funding

Gulf Nation Nears Implementation of Virtual Asset Regulations

Adam DeVine Joins Forces with Bitget in Year-Long Crypto Ad Partnership

Coinbase Files Motion to Dismiss SEC Lawsuit

/

Cryptocurrency exchange Coinbase, headquartered in the U.S., has submitted a motion to dismiss a lawsuit initiated by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

The SEC brought the lawsuit against Coinbase in June, approximately three months after the company received a Wells notice from the regulatory body.

In a legal document filed on August 4 with the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, Coinbase’s attorneys argue that the SEC has overstepped its authority, abused its discretion, and misinterpreted securities laws in exercising certain regulatory oversight over the exchange.

They referenced the SEC v. Ripple case, pointing out that a judge had determined that XRP did not predominantly meet the definition of a security as per the commission’s existing standards.

In the lawsuit, the SEC has alleged that 12 tokens in question meet the criteria of “investment contracts” under the Howey test and therefore Coinbase has been operating as an unregistered broker.

Coinbase disputes this assertion, maintaining that the SEC’s challenges regarding its staking program lack legal standing.

READ MORE: Binance-Backed Solv Protocol Raises $6M in New Funding

The firm requested the court to dismiss the case, alleging that the SEC’s action was “punitive” and overstepped the regulatory powers given to it by Congress.

Coinbase announced its decision to file the motion to dismiss during an earnings call on August 3. The company continues to refute the SEC’s accusations that it could have violated securities laws through its activities.

Coinbase is not alone in facing SEC scrutiny. The regulator is also pursuing enforcement actions against Binance and Hex founder Richard Heart.

Recently, U.S. legislators have pushed legislation through committees that might reform the SEC’s authority over digital assets, should it become law.

Other Stories:

Gulf Nation Nears Implementation of Virtual Asset Regulations

Adam DeVine Joins Forces with Bitget in Year-Long Crypto Ad Partnership

Bitcoin to Breach $100,000 by 2024 Amidst Mining Industry Challenges

Massachusetts Securities Regulators Launch Investigation into AI Use in Securities Industry

Massachusetts securities regulators have initiated an investigation into the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in the securities industry, expressing growing concerns about the potential implications of this emerging technology.

On August 3rd, William Galvin, the Secretary of the Commonwealth in Massachusetts, officially announced the investigation.

The commonwealth’s securities division had previously sent letters of inquiry to both registered and unregistered firms that were known to be utilizing or developing AI for their business operations within the securities industry.

The purpose of these letters was to gather data on how these companies were incorporating AI into their activities.

The targeted firms have until August 16, 2023, to respond to the regulator’s inquiries.

Among the aspects of AI utilization that particularly interest Galvin are the supervisory procedures that firms have in place to ensure that AI systems prioritize the interests of clients over those of the firm itself.

The securities division will also scrutinize the disclosure policies of firms that have already deployed AI.

Galvin stressed the significance of U.S. securities regulators in safeguarding investor protection regarding AI deployment.

He expressed concern that without proper disclosure and conflict consideration, this technology could potentially harm investors.

Aside from supervisory measures, Massachusetts securities regulators are also looking into marketing materials provided to investors that may have been generated using AI.

The global regulatory landscape has increasingly turned its attention to AI due to its rapid growth.

In the second fiscal quarter of 2023, major tech companies mentioned AI much more frequently during their earnings calls, indicating its prominence in business operations.

However, some regulators have been wary of the potential risks associated with AI for years. As early as 2017, the Financial Stability Board (FSB) voiced concerns about AI and machine learning in financial services.

One of the FSB’s specific concerns was the concentration of AI and machine learning services in a few large technology firms, potentially leading to natural monopolies or oligopolies.

This concentration could pose financial stability risks, as the disruption or insolvency of one of these firms could have widespread repercussions in the world of finance.

In light of these growing concerns, the Massachusetts securities division is taking proactive steps to investigate and understand the use of AI in the securities industry, aiming to protect investors and maintain financial stability in the face of advancing technological innovations.

BlackBerry Cybersecurity Thwarts Over 1.5 Million Attacks, Unveils Malware Threats to Crypto

Between March and May, BlackBerry’s cybersecurity division thwarted over 1.5 million cyberattacks, unveiling malware families that attempt to take control of computers for mining or theft of cryptocurrencies.

Finance, healthcare, and government sectors were found to be the most affected, as per the BlackBerry report.

The report highlighted a prevalent malware named RedLine, a perennial financial threat involved in the collection of cryptocurrency and banking data.

Another significant threat was the Clop ransomware, a version of the CryptoMix ransomware family, which particularly aimed at banking and financial organizations, causing the data breach of Hatch Bank, a fintech platform.

The most widespread malware families in BlackBerry’s data include SmokeLoader, RaccoonStealer, and Vidar. SmokeLoader, dating back to 2011, has mainly been utilized by Russian-based threat actors to deploy crypto miners and other malware.

READ MORE: Decentralized Exchange on Coinbase’s Base Network Pauses Trading Amidst Concerns of Exploit

RaccoonStealer has been implicated in stealing cryptocurrency wallet data and is purportedly being traded on the dark web. Vidar is another malware extensively used to harvest cryptocurrency wallets.

Linux stood out as the most targeted operating system. BlackBerry suggests that organizations using Linux should frequently update their security patches, as hackers often hijack Linux-based computers to mine cryptocurrencies.

Atomic macOS, a new breed of infostealer, primarily targets macOS users, collecting credentials from keychains, browsers, and crypto wallets.

In response to the growing cybersecurity threat, OpenAI, the developer of ChatGPT and Dall-e, announced a $1 million grant program to promote the development of AI-driven cybersecurity technologies.

The company stated in its official announcement, “Our aim is to foster the advancement of AI-driven cybersecurity capabilities for defenders through grants and additional assistance.”

This initiative underscores the urgent need for advanced cybersecurity measures in the face of an evolving threat landscape.

Other Stories:

U.S. Judge Denies Motion to Dismiss SEC Lawsuit Against Terraform Labs

Binance CEO CZ Unveils Plan to Launch Smaller Algorithmic Stablecoins

IRS Issues New Ruling: U.S. Crypto Investors Must Report Staking Rewards as Gross Income

U.S. Judge Denies Motion to Dismiss SEC Lawsuit Against Terraform Labs

The United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is moving forward with its lawsuit against Terraform Labs, as a U.S. judge overseeing the case denied the firm’s motion to dismiss on July 31.

This legal battle began on February 16 when the SEC filed a suit against Terraform Labs and its founder, Do Kwon, accusing them of orchestrating a multi-billion dollar crypto asset securities fraud.

Terraform Labs’ legal representatives tried to have the case dismissed in April, followed by additional materials supporting their motion in June.

Judge Jed Rakoff of the Southern District Court of New York reviewed the arguments and found that, for the purpose of this motion, all well-pleaded allegations must be taken as true, and all reasonable inferences must be drawn in favor of the SEC.

Terraform Labs had argued that the SEC lacked jurisdiction over the company and its founder.

They also contested the agency’s classification of tokens like Mirror Protocol (MIR), Terra Classic (LUNC), and TerraUSD Classic (USTC) as securities.

Terraform Labs further suggested that the SEC should wait for Congressional action on crypto regulation.

However, Judge Rakoff rejected the claim that the SEC lacked the authority to regulate crypto tokens without Congressional authorization.

READ MORE: Liquid Staking Tokens Poised to Dethrone Ethereum’s Ether (ETH) as Dominant DeFi Asset

He also disagreed with Terraform Labs’ reliance on the “Major Questions Doctrine.”

The judge extensively analyzed the Howey test, an important legal framework for determining whether an asset qualifies as a security.

He emphasized that no formal contract is necessary to meet the Howey test, and tokens themselves may be considered securities in court arguments.

Furthermore, Judge Rakoff rejected the idea of distinguishing between tokens like MIR and LUNA based on their manner of sale.

This rejection contrasts with a similar case involving Ripple Labs Inc., where another judge had drawn such a distinction.

The Ripple case involved the SEC’s claim that XRP was not a security when sold on the secondary market, which was partially accepted, providing Ripple with a partial win.

With Judge Rakoff’s ruling, the SEC’s case against Terraform Labs continues, indicating that the court is not following the same approach as in the Ripple case.

This ruling might have implications for future cases involving crypto assets and could set a precedent for the SEC’s regulation of the crypto industry.

Other Stories:

SEC Chairman Gary Gensler Raises Alarm Over Widespread Fraud in Crypto Market

BNB Smart Chain (BSC) Hit by Copycat Attacks

Bitcoin’s Reduced Volatility Sparks Anticipation for Exciting Long-Term Bull Signal

Nigerian Securities Commission Warns Against Binance

The Nigerian Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has issued a warning to local investors regarding the use of Binance, one of the world’s largest cryptocurrency exchanges.

This cautionary measure comes as a response to a previous circular issued against a fraudulent company that was illegally using the Binance brand.

On July 28, the SEC released a statement advising against investing with Binance, citing the absence of a valid license for operations in the country, thereby rendering its activities illegal.

The commission also emphasized the substantial risks associated with investing in cryptocurrencies, highlighting the potential for significant financial losses:

“Any member of the investing public dealing with the entity, making such solicitation is doing so at his/her own risk.”

This is not the first time the SEC has taken action against Binance.

In June, the commission published a similar circular, limiting the activities of Binance Nigeria, which was proven to be a fraudulent entity unaffiliated with the legitimate Binance exchange.

In response, Binance issued a cease and desist notice to Binance Nigeria.

READ MORE: SEC Chairman Gary Gensler Raises Alarm Over Widespread Fraud in Crypto Market

It’s worth noting that Nigeria has maintained a cautious approach to the crypto industry, despite its efforts to promote the central bank digital currency (CBDC), known as the eNaira, which was launched in 2021.

However, adoption rates of the eNaira have fallen below expectations, leading the central bank to explore options to boost its usage.

In July, the CBDC system was upgraded with near-field communication technology, enabling more convenient and secure contactless payments.

Furthermore, starting from May 2023, Nigeria implemented a 10% tax on gains from the sale of digital assets, including cryptocurrencies.

Local stakeholders criticized this measure as “premature.”

Cointelegraph sought further commentary from Binance regarding the SEC notice, but no additional statements have been provided at this time.

As for Binance and other unregistered platforms, the SEC demands an immediate cessation of services in Nigeria.

The regulatory body is determined to safeguard local investors and uphold the legality of financial activities within the country’s borders.

Other Stories:

Liquid Staking Tokens Poised to Dethrone Ethereum’s Ether (ETH) as Dominant DeFi Asset

Bitcoin’s Reduced Volatility Sparks Anticipation for Exciting Long-Term Bull Signal

BNB Smart Chain (BSC) Hit by Copycat Attacks

ConsenSys Unveils ‘Diligence Fuzzing’ Tool to Enhance Smart Contract Security

/

ConsenSys, a blockchain technology firm, has publicly launched its “Diligence Fuzzing” tool for smart contract testing, as revealed in an announcement on August 1.

This new tool is designed to identify vulnerabilities in contracts before they are deployed by generating “random and invalid data points.”

The release comes in the wake of significant losses in decentralized finance hacks, which surpassed $2.8 billion in 2022.

The escalating financial implications of these hacks have prompted developers to seek more sophisticated testing tools to proactively discover vulnerabilities before malicious attackers do.

Previously available as a closed beta version with access approval requirements, ConsenSys has now made Diligence Fuzzing accessible to all developers without any restrictions.

Additionally, the tool has been integrated with the smart contract toolkit Foundry, and developers can test it out for free before committing to any expenses.

Liz Daldalian, the lead of ConsenSys security services, elaborated on the functioning of the tool in an interview with Cointelegraph.

Developers can utilize “Scribble,” a machine language developed by ConsenSys, to annotate their contracts.

READ MORE:SEC Chairman Gary Gensler Raises Alarm Over Widespread Fraud in Crypto Market

These annotations allow the fuzzing tool to comprehend the contract’s logic and generate “unexpected” inputs to test whether the contract produces unintended actions under various scenarios.

The ConsenSys security researcher, Gonçalo Sá, clarified that Diligence Fuzzing is not a “black box fuzzer,” meaning it doesn’t employ completely random data.

Instead, it functions as a “grey-box fuzzer” that leverages an understanding of the contract’s current state to optimize the data produced and enhance the tool’s efficiency.

Sá observed an increasing interest in fuzzing among developers, particularly with the growing popularity of Foundry’s default black-box fuzzer.

Many users, however, seek a more sophisticated fuzzer than the default one, which Diligence Fuzzer aims to provide.

Sá emphasized that people are recognizing the power of fuzzing and are seeking more potent tools to fortify their security measures.

Smart contract hacks remain a persistent issue for users, with Web3 security vulnerabilities resulting in over $471.43 million in losses during the first half of 2023, excluding rug pulls and phishing scams.

While Diligence Fuzzing is not a foolproof solution to eradicate all smart contract hacks, Daldalian asserted that it represents one essential tool in developers’ arsenal to create more secure smart contracts.

By adopting such tools, the Web3 community can take significant strides towards mitigating losses from these attacks.

Other Stories:

Bitcoin’s Reduced Volatility Sparks Anticipation for Exciting Long-Term Bull Signal

Liquid Staking Tokens Poised to Dethrone Ethereum’s Ether (ETH) as Dominant DeFi Asset

BNB Smart Chain (BSC) Hit by Copycat Attacks

Binance Secures New License in Dubai

Binance, a major cryptocurrency exchange, has achieved a significant regulatory milestone in its relationship with authorities in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) by obtaining a new license in Dubai.

The license was granted to Binance’s Dubai-based subsidiary, Binance FZE, by Dubai’s Virtual Asset Regulatory Authority (VARA) on July 31.

With this operational minimum viable product (MVP) license, Binance is now officially permitted to offer cryptocurrency exchange and virtual asset broker-dealer services in Dubai.

However, the services allowed by the license are currently limited to institutional and qualified retail investors within Dubai.

Eligible investors in the region can access authorized services, including crypto-to-fiat exchanges that comply with the guidelines set by the intergovernmental Financial Action Task Force (FATF).

To become a user of Binance in Dubai, an investor must hold the status of a “qualified retail client” and meet specific criteria.

This includes being at least 21 years old and having a net liquid asset value of 500,000 United Arab Emirates dirhams ($136,000), supported by relevant documentation such as bank statements and proof of funds.

Qualified investors also need to provide valid identification documents like passports, visas, and proof of a valid UAE address with contact details.

Binance’s Dubai entity can now offer a range of services, including crypto-to-fiat exchange and conversions, transfers and custody, brokerage, and virtual asset payments and remittance services.

This latest regulatory achievement for Binance builds upon the progression from the provisional MVP license issued by VARA in March 2022, as well as the preparatory MVP license obtained in September 2022.

READ MORE: Tech Firms Call on European Union to Support Open-Source AI in New Regulations

In April 2023, VARA requested more information from Binance about its business requirements, aiming to enhance regulatory standards in Dubai.

Binance complied with the request and expressed its willingness to cooperate further with VARA as they prepare for the next phase of licensing.

It’s worth noting that the preparatory MVP license previously granted by VARA only allowed exchanges to serve a restricted set of accredited investors.

This limitation was highlighted by some crypto exchanges, such as Bybit, earlier this year.

The news of Binance’s new license comes shortly after VAR suspended the operational license of another crypto exchange, BitOasis, for not meeting regulatory conditions within specified timeframes.

BitOasis is currently working with VARA to fulfill the remaining conditions.

Binance emphasized that VARA’s framework includes compulsory rulebooks related to general operations, compliance, and market conduct requirements.

Key highlights of these regulations were published by VARA in 2023.

As Binance moves forward with its operations in Dubai, it will continue to comply with the regulatory standards set by the UAE authorities.

Other Stories:

SEC Suffers Setback as Court Overturns Ruling on SPIKES Index Securities Classification

Margot Robbie’s Comparison of Bitcoin to Ken from Barbie Ignites Debate

Blockchain Could Save Financial Institutions $10 Billion by 2030: Ripple-FPC Report

1 48 49 50 51 52 344