SEC - Page 48

3440 result(s) found.

Bitwise Surprises Market by Withdrawing Bitcoin and Ether ETF Application Amid SEC Delays

/

Bitwise, the asset management firm, has taken an unexpected step by withdrawing its application for a Bitcoin and Ether Market Cap Weight Strategy exchange-traded fund (ETF) from the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

Initially filed on August 3, the move came as a surprise given the recent positive market sentiment following Grayscale’s success with the SEC.

The withdrawal statement contained a cautious tone, stating that while the fund aimed to achieve capital appreciation, there were no guarantees of meeting this investment objective.

Matt Hougan, Bitwise’s chief investment officer, had recently voiced support for SEC approval of all ETFs in a Bloomberg interview.

The ETF in question was designed to invest in either Bitcoin or Ether futures contracts, selected based on their respective market capitalizations.

In conjunction with ProShares, Bitwise had also planned to launch another ETF around the same time.

Bitwise clarified in the withdrawal statement that the Trust had abandoned its plans to pursue the effectiveness of the Fund.

The Trust did not sell or intend to sell any Fund securities as part of the process.

This development aligns with the SEC’s continued delay in deciding on various Bitcoin ETF applications, including those from WisdomTree, Invesco Galaxy, Valkyrie, VanEck, BlackRock, Bitwise, and Fidelity.

READ MORE: BlockFi Advances Fund Recovery Efforts with Court Application

The SEC’s recent filing on August 31 disclosed an extended review timeline for several spot Bitcoin ETF applications.

WisdomTree, VanEck, Invesco Galaxy, Bitwise, Valkyrie, Fidelity’s Wise Origin Bitcoin Trust, and BlackRock’s Bitcoin ETF face a longer evaluation period.

Upcoming deadlines for the SEC are set for mid-October, but potential delays could push them to the third batch of deadlines in January or to final decisions in the subsequent months.

Bitwise had previously been at the forefront of asset management firms seeking Bitcoin ETF products.

Its initial application in January 2019 aimed to create a BTC-backed ETF tracking the Bitwise Bitcoin Total Return Index, derived from BTC transaction values across various exchanges.

The firm’s proposal sought to provide a reliable representation of the broader cryptocurrency market, with data sourced from multiple cryptocurrency exchanges.

Additionally, third-party custodians were to be responsible for physically holding Bitcoin.

Notably, this is not Bitwise’s first ETF withdrawal. Earlier this year, the company pulled back an application for an Ethereum Strategy ETF.

The ETF had been designed to invest in both front-time and back-time Ethereum futures, but the withdrawal occurred only a week after the initial application was submitted.

Other Stories:

South Korean Parliamentary Subcommittee Rejects Expulsion Motion Over Cryptocurrency Controversy

Bitcoin Holds Strong Above $27,000 as Traders Maintain Bullish Outlook

BlockFi Advances Fund Recovery Efforts with Court Application

US Crypto Industry Sees Hope in Court Rulings Restraining SEC

The United States may be poised for a resurgence in the cryptocurrency sector, as recent court rulings appear to be reining in the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), according to a digital asset attorney from K&L Gates.

Jeremy McLaughlin, a partner at the international law firm, highlighted the trend during his participation in the Intersekt23 conference in Melbourne on August 31.

McLaughlin noted that a series of U.S. court cases have challenged SEC Chair Gary Gensler’s stance that nearly all digital assets should be classified as securities.

He explained that while initial crypto regulations were primarily established at the state level and relatively straightforward, the involvement of federal bodies like the SEC and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission led to increased market restrictions.

The attorney pointed out that due to the SEC’s aggressive approach, many tokens were delisted, and some companies even exited the U.S. market.

However, recent court decisions have begun to curtail the SEC’s assertiveness, rekindling optimism within the industry.

Recent examples of the SEC facing setbacks include its loss in a lawsuit brought by a crypto firm and a separate case where a crypto firm prevailed against the SEC.

A noteworthy instance occurred on August 29 when a U.S. District Court judge ruled against the SEC’s denial of Grayscale Investments’ application to convert its flagship Bitcoin fund into an exchange-traded fund.

READ MORE: Digital Currency Group Reaches Agreement with Genesis Creditors for Potential Recovery

Similarly, a judge ruled in July that Ripple Labs’ XRP was not a security when sold to retail traders, leading to a partial loss for the SEC.

Despite these developments, McLaughlin acknowledged the challenges of providing legal advice in such a rapidly evolving landscape and lamented the lack of clear guidance for clients.

However, he expressed optimism that the chaos in crypto regulation was subsiding as court decisions increasingly favored the digital asset industry.

Regarding Australia’s crypto legislation, panelists at the conference discussed its comparative state.

Effie Dimitropoulos, Chief of payment services firm Novatti, described Australia’s regulations as “lagging” in comparison to new frameworks in Hong Kong and the European Union.

She highlighted the uncertainty faced by local crypto businesses due to the evolving legal landscape, resulting in the potential obsolescence of legal advice.

Dimitropoulos further emphasized the need for clear resolutions from regulatory bodies such as the Australian Securities and Investments Commission and the Treasurer to alleviate the ongoing uncertainty.

In conclusion, the U.S. crypto industry is showing signs of renewal as court rulings moderate the SEC’s regulatory zeal, while Australia’s crypto regulations are criticized for falling behind international standards.

Other Stories:

Grayscale Bitcoin Trust’s Negative Price ‘Discount’ Expected to Reverse by 2024

Federal Judge Overturns SEC’s Denial of Grayscale’s Bitcoin ETF

dYdX Unlocks $14.02 Million in DYDK Tokens for Community and Trader Rewards

SEC’s First NFT Enforcement Sparks Debate Over Regulatory Impact on NFT Projects

/

The recent enforcement action by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) against an NFT project has ignited a debate within the community, raising concerns about potential repercussions for similar projects falling under the same description and becoming targets for future SEC actions.

On August 28, the SEC took legal action against entertainment company Impact Theory, alleging the sale of unregistered securities through their NFTs named “Founder’s Keys.”

The SEC claims these NFTs were marketed as investments in the company, resulting in a purported fundraising of approximately $30 million.

The SEC contends that the NFTs in question meet the criteria for investment contracts and should be classified as securities.

According to the commission, the company violated the Securities Act of 1933 by conducting NFT sales without proper registration.

However, not everyone concurs with the SEC’s stance.

On the same day, SEC commissioners Hester Peirce and Mark Uyeda expressed their dissent, arguing that the statements made by the company and purchasers cited in the order do not constitute the kind of promises that form an investment contract.

Peirce and Uyeda further highlighted the SEC’s inconsistency in not pursuing enforcement actions against sales of other collectible items like watches and paintings that also come with vague promises of brand-building and increased resale value.

The incident has elicited reactions from community members who believe that numerous NFT projects align with the SEC’s description.

READ MORE: Europe Welcomes First-Ever Bitcoin ETF

A representative from the well-known NFT collection Azuki noted the potential significance of the case, suggesting that multiple NFT projects could share similarities with the charged project.

Critics contend that many NFT project founders, akin to Impact Theory, promote their offerings by enticing potential buyers with promises of profits tied to the project’s success.

In a conversation with Cointelegraph, Oscar Franklin Tan, Chief Legal Officer of NFT platform Enjin, expressed concerns over labeling all NFTs as securities.

Tan emphasized the diverse nature of NFTs, which can range from visual art to health records and property titles.

He cautioned against stifling creators’ exploration of various Web3 models due to regulatory uncertainty.

Tan emphasized the need for clearer regulatory guidelines from the SEC to prevent creators from inadvertently producing investment products and hindering the potential benefits of Web3 models.

This situation is not the first instance where NFTs have been debated in the context of securities.

Earlier in the year, a U.S. judge indicated that NBA Top Shot NFTs might qualify as securities based on the legal relationship established between investors and promoters.

As the debate rages on, the outcome of this case could set a precedent for the classification of NFTs in terms of securities regulation, shaping the future landscape of NFT projects and their interactions with regulatory authorities.

Other Stories:

Argo Blockchain Shows Resilience with 50% Reduction in Half-Year Losses

Shibarium Surpasses 100,000 Wallets in 24 Hours Post-Relaunch

Anticipation Grows as Bitcoin Halving Nears, Experts Predict Surge Beyond $100,000

Federal Judge Overturns SEC’s Denial of Grayscale’s Bitcoin ETF

/

A federal judge has overturned the United States Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) denial of Grayscale Investments’ exchange-traded fund (ETF) proposal for its Bitcoin Trust.

However, experts caution that this ruling does not guarantee the immediate approval of the first Bitcoin ETF in the country.

Judge Neomi Rao of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ruled on August 29 that Grayscale’s Bitcoin ETF plan was “materially similar” to already approved Bitcoin futures exchange-traded products by the SEC.

Rao’s decision largely criticized the SEC’s reasoning for rejecting Grayscale’s ETF, which was based on the ETF not being “designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices.”

Consequently, the matter will be sent back to the SEC for further review.

The U.S. SEC has consistently rejected applications for spot cryptocurrency ETFs thus far. Various applications, including those from BlackRock, ARK Invest, Bitwise Asset Management, and others, are currently under review.

The commission retains the authority to delay decisions on these applications, potentially postponing approvals until March 2024.

The SEC has not yet publicly commented on the appeals court’s ruling, but reports suggest that the commission will assess the case to determine its subsequent steps.

READ MORE: Argo Blockchain Shows Resilience with 50% Reduction in Half-Year Losses

While the SEC may contest the ruling, experts speculate that Grayscale’s initial triumph might set a precedent for future approvals.

ETC Group’s CEO, Tim Bevan, expressed confidence that the victory would pave the way for U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs despite an anticipated SEC appeal.

He predicted a likely mass approval of applications meeting requirements, possibly occurring in the first quarter of 2024.

Alex Adelman, CEO and co-founder of Lolli, contended that the appeals court’s decision would pressurize the SEC to reconsider its stance on spot Bitcoin ETFs.

Adelman perceived the surge in BTC price following the news as a “vote of confidence” in investment products linked to Bitcoin.

The Crypto Council for Innovation (CCI) spokesperson noted that the ruling broadens the scope for various investors to introduce spot Bitcoin vehicles in the U.S., bringing spot Bitcoin ETFs closer to potential launch.

The next steps for Grayscale or the SEC remain uncertain. Grayscale could rework its application to align more closely with a Bitcoin futures-linked ETF.

Alternatively, the SEC might opt for an “en banc” hearing involving all judges on the D.C. circuit, rather than the three who presided over the Grayscale case.

Other Stories:

Shibarium Surpasses 100,000 Wallets in 24 Hours Post-Relaunch

Europe Welcomes First-Ever Bitcoin ETF

Anticipation Grows as Bitcoin Halving Nears, Experts Predict Surge Beyond $100,000

Pro-XRP Attorney Challenges SEC’s Allegations Against Ripple CEO

/

Pro-XRP advocate John Deaton has criticized the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for its handling of the allegations against Ripple’s CEO Brad Garlinghouse.

Deaton asserts that the SEC’s accusations of aiding and abetting were misguided.

He points to revelations from former SEC officials Bill Hinman and Jay Clayton during the SEC vs. Ripple Labs case, which suggested that XRP should have been considered a non-security.

Despite this, the SEC ignored this information for an extended period.

Digital Asset Investor.XRP, a user on the platform X (previously known as Twitter), expressed the opinion that summoning a16z attorneys Lowell Ness and Chris Dixon, alongside former SEC officials Clayton and Hinman, would have been a more strategic move in the legal battle between the SEC and Ripple.

Deaton concurs that Hinman’s testimony would have been pivotal, but acknowledges the challenges of legally summoning a former SEC chair for trial.

Nonetheless, Deaton argues that the SEC made a mistake in charging Garlinghouse, particularly given Clayton’s history of pursuing complaints against executives in non-fraudulent contexts.

READ MORE: Binance’s Russian P2P Crypto Exchange Renames Sanctioned Banks Amidst Controversy

Deaton emphasizes the significance of Clayton as a witness whose testimony should have been presented in court.

Clayton had interactions with Ripple’s CEO and chief technology officer, during which Garlinghouse remarked that “Ripple is living in purgatory” after the Hinman speech.

However, neither Clayton nor Hinman explicitly designated XRP as a security.

Seeking clarity from these former SEC officials could have potentially saved time and legal expenses, potentially fostering greater adoption of cryptocurrencies.

Despite Judge Analisa Torres ruling that XRP doesn’t qualify as a security in certain cases, the SEC aims to challenge this decision.

In a recent development, a substantial holder of XRP transferred over $20 million worth of tokens to exchanges amid the ongoing breach of its support levels, indicating potential market instability.

Other Stories:

Bitcoin’s Evolution Accelerates: Recursive Inscriptions Unveil New Horizons Beyond Cryptocurrency

Galaxy Digital Poised to Manage FTX’s Recovered Cryptocurrency Holdings

XRP Faces Investor Sell-Off as Whale Transfers 29 Million Tokens Amid Price Dip

Singapore’s Vauld Crypto Exchange Secures Court Approval for Board Restructuring

Singapore-based cryptocurrency exchange Vauld, which has been embroiled in bankruptcy proceedings since August 2022, has announced a pivotal development in its journey towards recovery.

The company recently received court approval to initiate a comprehensive restructuring of its board, signifying a significant step forward in its efforts to stabilize and rejuvenate its operations.

Co-founder of Vauld, Darshan Bathija, took to social media platform X (formerly known as Twitter) on August 24th to reveal that the company’s proposed scheme of arrangement had successfully gained judicial endorsement within a Singaporean court.

As per the approved scheme, Vauld’s current board is set to undergo a transformative overhaul.

The restructured leadership will include a fresh Chief Executive Officer (CEO), a representative chosen by the creditors, and a capable scheme manager.

In a demonstration of its commitment to regulatory compliance and operational integrity, Vauld has reinitiated the Know Your Customer (KYC) verification process for its existing clientele.

These clients are now required to resubmit their verification documents, marking a concerted effort to enhance transparency and security within the platform’s operations.

The company’s plight was catalyzed in August 2022 when Indian law enforcement seized a substantial sum of $46.4 million from Vauld’s Indian subsidiary, Flipvolt Technologies.

This action was spurred by allegations of money laundering, further exacerbating the exchange’s financial challenges.

Vauld faced an array of obstacles, including the temporary suspension of customer withdrawals in July 2022.

This measure was attributed to both unfavorable market conditions and a significant withdrawal surge, amounting to $200 million.

READ MORE: New DeSo Network Friend.tech Generates Over $1 Million in 24 Hours

The company’s financial turmoil was exacerbated by losses linked to the declining values of major cryptocurrencies, as well as its exposure to the beleaguered stablecoin TerraUSD (UST), which suffered a collapse in May 2022.

Following these setbacks, Vauld was granted a three-month moratorium in August 2022 to devise a viable restructuring strategy.

An initial proposal suggested an acquisition by Swiss crypto lending entity Nexo, though negotiations with Nexo were terminated in January 2023.

Amidst these ongoing challenges, Vauld obtained successive periods of creditor protection from Singaporean courts.

The company’s outstanding debts, totaling around $400 million, primarily encompass funds owed to individual depositors.

With the court’s approval of its restructuring plan, Vauld is poised to embark on a transformative journey under new leadership.

This pivotal juncture could potentially pave the way for the exchange’s resurgence and the restoration of trust among its stakeholders.

Other Stories:

UK Prime Minister Allocates £100 Million to Acquire Computer Chips for AI Advancement

Bitget Cryptocurrency Exchange Enhances KYC Procedures to Align with Global Regulations

Ordinal Inscriptions Maintain Dominance on Bitcoin Network Despite Price Dip

Shibarium’s Anticipated Layer-2 Launch Nears, Promising Enhanced User Experience and Security

Blockchain technology continues its forward march with the imminent public unveiling of Shibarium’s eagerly awaited layer-2 version.

The Shiba Inu team has eagerly announced that the platform is in seamless operation and merely awaits its public debut.

Behind Shibarium, an Ethereum layer-2 network, stands a team that has signaled the platform’s current live status in its private mode.

Following a two-day test that demonstrated its smooth functionality, the platform teeters on the edge of accessibility to the wider public.

In a recent blog post, the Shibarium team assured users that their funds remain secure, and an enhanced experience awaits once the platform opens its doors to all.

The early beneficiaries of this update are already celebrating as bridged BONE tokens make their entry.

Responding to this development, the Shibarium community, affectionately known as the Shib Army, has been expressing their excitement on X (previously known as Twitter).

The team proudly expressed its contentment with the progress achieved, asserting that the network has reached a “ready” state after meticulous testing and parameter adjustments.

Notably, block generation remains consistently glitch-free.

Recent updates to the platform encompass significant safety augmentations and a robust monitoring system.

These enhancements encompass the introduction of rate limitations at the remote procedure call (RPC) level and an automatic server reset mechanism.

READ MORE:SEC Lawsuit Stifles XRP’s US Adoption Potential, Pro-XRP Advocate Asserts Amid Coinbase’s Moves

These proactive measures aim to preclude potential issues stemming from abrupt traffic spikes, ensuring users a reliable and uninterrupted experience.

During its testing phase, the network garnered substantial attention, with millions of wallets engaging in over 22 million transactions spanning a four-month period.

However, the initial launch wasn’t devoid of challenges.

An overwhelming surge in activity temporarily overwhelmed the network, causing a halt in transactions for several hours.

This occurrence led to millions of dollars becoming stuck on a bridge tool and subsequently triggered a 10% decline in the value of Shiba Inu.

Subsequently, the development team swiftly addressed these challenges, attributing the server overload to an unforeseen spike in transaction volume.

With the lessons learned, the team is now confident in the success of the forthcoming reopening, undeterred by the initial stumbling blocks.

Other Stories:

Bybit Unveils NFT Collection as Part of Velocity Series

Global Disparities in Bitcoin Mining Costs Highlighted: From $208,560 in Italy to $266 in Lebanon

FTX Founder Seeks Release for Defense Collaboration

SEC Poised to Approve Multiple Ether Futures ETFs

The United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is reportedly poised to greenlight a series of applications for Ether futures exchange-traded funds (ETFs) concurrently, sources familiar with the matter have informed The Wall Street Journal.

Numerous investment firms have inundated the regulator with applications since July, encompassing proposals that combine futures strategies for both Bitcoin (BTC) and Ether (ETH).

Unlike in 2021, when similar applications were met with directives to withdraw, the SEC has refrained from instructing firms to retract their current submissions.

This divergence suggests that the regulatory body is unlikely to impede the imminent launch of these funds, as insiders have shared with WSJ.

A trove of at least 16 applications for Ether or Bitcoin-Ether futures ETFs is currently awaiting regulatory clearance.

Ether, the indigenous token of the Ethereum blockchain, serves as the medium for peer-to-peer transactions within the decentralized network.

A cryptocurrency futures ETF shadows the progress of cryptocurrency futures contracts.

For instance, rather than directly investing in Bitcoin or Ethereum, a cryptocurrency futures ETF invests in futures contracts pegged to the valuation of these digital assets.

Recent developments reveal an ongoing scramble to obtain approval for crypto futures.

Valkyrie, an asset management entity, is emblematic of this trend, having recently filed for an Ether futures ETF and a preexisting application integrating a Bitcoin-Ether futures approach.

As the frontrunner in this competitive endeavor, Valkyrie stands poised to introduce its BTC-ETH ETF to the market as early as October.

READ MORE:Tether Discontinues Bitcoin Omni Layer Version Due to Waning Interest

Within the ETF sector, pioneering status carries significant weight.

Data from Morningstar, as cited by WSJ, accentuates this point, illustrating that the inaugural futures Bitcoin ETF, sanctioned by ProShares in October 2021, has amassed $1 billion in assets under management.

In a similar vein, Valkyrie’s analogous product, launched shortly thereafter, has garnered nearly $28 million in assets under management.

Meanwhile, the crypto industry remains on tenterhooks, awaiting the SEC’s verdict on a prospective spot Bitcoin ETF in the United States.

Notable industry giants like Fidelity and BlackRock are among the hopefuls.

The application timeline stipulates that the SEC has until January to render a final decision that will reverberate across the financial landscape.

Other Stories:

Former US President Donald Trump’s Ethereum Wallet Surges to $2.8 Million

Shiba Inu’s Shibarium Network Restarts Block Production After Temporary Pause

Bitcoin Hovers Near 2-Month Lows Amidst Extensive Liquidations and Market Uncertainty

Gemini Counters SEC Lawsuit with Strong Rebuttal, Challenging Claims of Alleged Securities Violations

Cryptocurrency exchange Gemini has taken a step in its bid to counter the lawsuit brought against it by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), by submitting a reply brief.

The lawsuit revolves around allegations that Gemini Earn, a service enabling customers to lend cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin to Genesis, violated securities regulations by offering unregistered securities.

Gemini’s recent court documents, dated August 18 and filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, strongly contest the SEC’s claims.

The exchange asserts that the SEC has failed to make a clear and solid case, indicating that “Section 5 of the securities act is not hard to understand.”

Gemini contends that the SEC’s inability to precisely define the security in question underscores the fragility of its position.

The exchange further posits that the court should not wade through the convoluted analyses presented by the SEC.

Instead, it suggests that the agency should ask direct and uncomplicated questions to ascertain whether the alleged breach qualifies as a security.

Key queries include the timing of the supposed security sale, the identity of the buyer and seller, as well as the offered or charged price.

Gemini argues that the SEC’s responsibility lies in pinpointing the unregistered security before identifying the sale or offer associated with it.

According to Gemini, the SEC has failed to fulfill this basic requirement.

The exchange’s filing asserts that the SEC’s opposition “avoids the question before the court.”

READ MORE: Tether Discontinues Bitcoin Omni Layer Version Due to Waning Interest

In earlier court filings on May 27, Gemini contended that transactions conducted within the Gemini Earn program were akin to loans.

The exchange requested the SEC to dismiss the complaint.

In a statement made on August 19, Jack Baugham, a founding partner of JFB Legal representing Gemini, highlighted the changing stance of the SEC as the lawsuit progresses.

Baugham expressed that the SEC’s inability to determine the nature of the security being referred to muddles their argument.

The regulator’s contradictory positions, such as labeling the Loan Agreement a security while simultaneously claiming the entire Gemini Earn program to be a security, are deemed absurd by Baugham.

In summary, Gemini’s reply brief contests the SEC’s lawsuit, emphasizing that the agency has not clearly established its case regarding the alleged breach of securities regulations by the Gemini Earn service.

The exchange argues that the SEC’s confusion about the nature of the security and its inconsistent claims undermine the legitimacy of the lawsuit.

Other Stories:

Bitcoin Hovers Near 2-Month Lows Amidst Extensive Liquidations and Market Uncertainty

Shiba Inu’s Shibarium Network Restarts Block Production After Temporary Pause

Former US President Donald Trump’s Ethereum Wallet Surges to $2.8 Million

SEC Lawsuit Stifles XRP’s US Adoption Potential, Pro-XRP Advocate Asserts Amid Coinbase’s Moves

/

The December 2020 lawsuit by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) against Ripple has significantly hindered the growth and adoption of the XRP token in the United States, according to pro-XRP advocate John Deaton, as conveyed in a recent post on X (formerly Twitter).

Deaton’s remarks came in response to Coinbase’s recent announcement of acquiring a minority stake in Circle, the issuer of USD Coin (USDC).

Coinbase’s plan to enhance the USDC ecosystem prompted Deaton to reflect on the missed potential for Ripple and XRP in the cross-border payment arena, suggesting that Coinbase’s interest might have been similarly sparked if not for the SEC’s legal action.

The pro-XRP advocate underscored that Coinbase had once actively supported XRP, but the lawsuit compelled the platform to remove the token.

He noted that Coinbase had taken thorough precautions, reaching out to the SEC to ascertain XRP’s regulatory standing before listing it.

In a January 2019 meeting with the SEC, Coinbase had explained its stringent regulatory evaluation process, which had even garnered praise from a senior SEC staff member.

At the time, the SEC raised no objections to Coinbase’s proposal, leading to the listing of XRP on the exchange in February 2019.

Similarly, MoneyGram, a major payment processor and a key partner of Ripple in remittances, had submitted a filing to the SEC outlining its plans for XRP usage.

This submission faced no regulatory challenges.

READ MORE: Binance Contemplates Legal Action Against Former Payment Provider

Deaton highlighted that both Coinbase’s legal team and MoneyGram had, through their evaluations, determined XRP not to be a security, a view that the SEC itself had seemingly shared in June 2018.

Despite these assessments, the SEC initiated a lawsuit against Ripple in December 2020.

The pro-XRP advocate argued that the lawsuit was wielded as a weapon and emphasized that the evidence accumulated over the past three years supports this assertion.

Deaton concluded that the lawsuit inflicted notable harm on XRP’s adoption, despite Ripple’s continued accomplishments abroad.

Notably, on July 13, New York District Court Judge Analisa Torres issued a partial ruling in favor of Ripple Labs, determining that the sale of XRP on digital asset exchanges should not be considered a security.

In summary, the SEC’s lawsuit against Ripple in December 2020 had a detrimental impact on the adoption and growth of the XRP token within the United States.

Proponents of XRP, like John Deaton, argue that the legal action hindered the trajectory that Ripple and XRP were on, potentially stalling their adoption in cross-border payments and curtailing opportunities for partnerships with entities like Coinbase.

Other Stories:

Ripple Labs vs. SEC: Appeals Process Sparks Debate Over Ongoing Legal Case

US Tech Giant Fires New Warning About ChatGPT

Crypto Industry Adapts to Bear Market

1 46 47 48 49 50 344