SEC - Page 47

3440 result(s) found.

Binance.US Challenges SEC’s ‘Unreasonable’ Demands in Legal Showdown

Binance.US has firmly responded to the United States Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) recent motion to compel and reply, characterizing most of the SEC’s demands as “unreasonable” and “unduly burdensome.”

In a legal move made on September 12, attorneys representing BAM Trading Services, the entity operating the Binance.US cryptocurrency exchange, submitted confidential documents contesting the SEC’s request for additional information from Binance.US.

The defendants contended that the SEC’s requests for production and interrogatories were excessively broad, imposing an undue burden and extending beyond the scope defined in the consent order.

They further criticized the SEC’s pursuit of certainty and their requests for depositions of BAM CEO Brian Shroder and CFO Jasmine Lee, deeming them “unreasonable.”

BAM’s legal representatives emphasized that the SEC’s motion failed to identify any evidence implicating Shroder and Lee in the day-to-day management details related to the custody and transfer of customer assets at Binance.US.

The attorneys argued, “BAM’s CEO and CFO have no unique knowledge regarding facts relevant to the limited topics identified in the consent order’s expedited discovery provision.”

They also highlighted that BAM had presented alternative witnesses, like BAM’s Chief Information Security Officer, Erik Kellogg, who possessed more pertinent insights into BAM’s operations.

READ MORE: Vitalik Buterin’s X Account Breached: Over $691K Lost to Malicious NFT Link

The lawyers contended that the burden imposed by the requested depositions far outweighed any potential benefits and that the discovery sought was disproportionate to the needs outlined in the consent order.

Moreover, BAM’s legal team contended that the SEC had failed to provide any substantive evidence to support its allegations of asset diversion, characterizing these allegations as “misleading and mistaken.”

The attorneys pointed out a “complete disconnect” between the SEC’s “overbroad and abusive approach” and the limited expedited discovery framework to which the SEC had previously agreed in the consent order.

BAM’s response came shortly after both the SEC and Binance reached an agreement on a protective motion.

This motion mandated the filing of confidential information under seal, with restricted access only to specific parties including the judge, attorneys, plaintiffs, and defendants.

This joint motion was submitted on September 11, ensuring the confidentiality of protected materials in the ongoing legal proceedings.

Other Stories:

Coinbase CEO Foresees Crypto’s Major Role in 2024 Elections, Urges Clearer Regulations

Terra Classic Community Proposes Minimum Deposit Hike to Combat Spam

Rise of Senior Executives Leading Digital Asset Strategies Signals Investment Firm Transformation

SEC Pursues Appeal in Ripple Labs Lawsuit Over XRP’s Security Classification

The United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has submitted a filing, urging the court to grant its motion to appeal a ruling from the Ripple Labs lawsuit that deemed the XRP token to not be a security when sold to retail investors.

The agency argues that “knotty legal problems” surrounding the court’s application of the law, specifically the Howey test, warrant a review.

In a filing dated September 8, the SEC calls for the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York to grant its motion for interlocutory appeal and “stay further proceedings until the resolution of that appeal,” citing the “knotty legal problems” raised by the court’s summary judgment order.

Judge Analisa Torres ruled in July that XRP is generally not a security under SEC guidelines, particularly when distributed via programmatic sales, such as being sold to retail investors through exchanges.

In its latest filing, the SEC argues that the rulings on programmatic sales and other distributions present significant “legal questions” justifying approval of the agency’s interlocutory appeal.

The SEC suggests that the legal ambiguity arises from whether certain crypto assets fall under the classification of investment contracts via the Howey test, citing differing opinions within the district and other courts considering similar issues.

READ MORE: Singapore’s MAS Maintains Strict Stance on Crypto Participation in Regulatory Sandbox

The SEC states that while interlocutory appeal should be the exception, this case is exceptional due to its industry-wide significance and special consequence, inviting interlocutory appeal.

These sentiments contradict previous statements from the SEC and its Chair, Gary Gensler, who has previously opposed the need for new crypto regulation, asserting that the SEC’s existing guidelines adequately cover the crypto market, including the notion that most crypto assets on the market are securities.

In a September 8 tweet, Ripple’s chief legal officer Stuart Alderoty calls the SEC’s filing “hypocritical” in light of Gensler’s prior statements about clear rules.

Coinbase’s chief legal officer, Paul Grewal, also questions how crypto firms can have “fair notice” if unresolved legal questions persist in court.

The SEC originally moved to appeal and stay Judge Torres’s decision in August, arguing substantial differences of opinion.

On September 1, Ripple Labs responded with a memorandum of law opposing the SEC’s appeal, contending that the agency lacks substantial grounds for the requested appeal.

Other Stories:

Ant Group Unveils ZAN Sub-Brand for Web3 Blockchain Development Services

Block Earner Forges Ahead with Crypto-Backed Loans Despite Legal Battle with Regulatorc

Crypto Exchange CEO and Siblings Sentenced to Over 11,000 Years in Prison

Nasdaq Granted SEC Approval for Groundbreaking AI-Driven Exchange Order Type

Nasdaq received approval from the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on September 8 to launch the first AI-driven exchange order type.

This innovative system, known as the dynamic midpoint extended life order (M-ELO), builds upon the existing M-ELO automated order type by incorporating real-time artificial intelligence (AI) capabilities, allowing it to continuously adjust and recalibrate itself.

Order types involve sets of software instructions that execute specific trade pairs at precise market pricing thresholds.

While automation of this kind has been in use for some time, the introduction of AI-driven order types marks a groundbreaking development, employing real-time reinforcement learning AI for order execution.

This advancement is expected to significantly accelerate order processing within the system.

Nasdaq revealed in a blog post that during research and testing, dynamic M-ELO achieved a remarkable “20.3% increase in fill rates and an 11.4% reduction in mark-outs.”

READ MORE: Block Earner Forges Ahead with Crypto-Backed Loans Despite Legal Battle with Regulator

Operating on a symbol-by-symbol basis, this new functionality continuously analyzes over 140 data points every 30 seconds to detect market conditions and optimize the holding period for trade execution eligibility.

This dynamic approach, in contrast to the traditional system’s static timeouts, should enhance fill rates without causing notable market impact.

The integration of artificial intelligence technologies in the fintech sector has had a profound impact on the entire financial industry.

Large language models like ChatGPT have found applications as educational tools for both traditional stock and cryptocurrency traders.

Nasdaq’s prior ventures into combining AI with finance included incorporating predictive AI models to assist in processing the vast array of over 1.5 million options listings in the U.S. market.

Other Stories:

Ant Group Unveils ZAN Sub-Brand for Web3 Blockchain Development Services

Crypto Exchange CEO and Siblings Sentenced to Over 11,000 Years in Prison

Singapore’s MAS Maintains Strict Stance on Crypto Participation in Regulatory Sandbox

Congressman Takes Aim at SEC’s Digital Asset Enforcement Spending

On September 8, United States Representative Tom Emmer, the Majority Whip of the U.S. House of Representatives, sponsored an appropriations amendment aimed at restricting the U.S. Securities Exchange Commission’s (SEC) use of funds for digital asset enforcement.

Emmer, a vocal critic of the SEC’s actions in the cryptocurrency industry, particularly the leadership of SEC Chair Gary Gensler, alleged that Gensler had exceeded his authority, resulting in adverse consequences for the American people.

Emmer urged Congress to employ available methods and proper procedures to prevent potential misuse of taxpayer funds by Gensler and the SEC.

Emmer’s history includes co-sponsoring several bills designed to improve regulatory transparency within the United States.

He asserted that Gary Gensler had abused his authority to expand the Administrative State, to the detriment of the American people, emphasizing the necessity for Congress to employ all available tools, including the appropriations process, to restrain Gensler from further leveraging taxpayer dollars.

READ MORE: Ant Group Unveils ZAN Sub-Brand for Web3 Blockchain Development Services

The appropriations amendment Emmer introduced will limit the SEC’s use of funds for digital asset enforcement until comprehensive rules and regulations are established.

Concerns have arisen due to the absence of cryptocurrency regulations, with Emmer suggesting that the SEC’s substantial expenditures on legal disputes with numerous crypto entities might constitute a “weaponization” of taxpayer funds.

In a separate legislative move, Emmer introduced the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act, which clarifies that blockchain developers and service providers should not be classified as money transmitters, as they do not hold consumer funds in custody.

This distinction is intended to relieve non-custody providers from unnecessary compliance burdens that could hinder innovation in the United States, ensuring that validators, miners, and other noncustodial service providers are not grouped together with custody providers.

Prominent figures in the blockchain sector, including Blockchain Association CEO Kristin Smith and Crypto Council CEO Sheila Warren, voiced their support for Emmer’s proposed legislation.

Additionally, Emmer threw his support behind Representative Warren Davidson’s SEC Stabilization Act, which aims to remove Gary Gensler from his position as SEC chair.

Other Stories:

Block Earner Forges Ahead with Crypto-Backed Loans Despite Legal Battle with Regulator

Singapore’s MAS Maintains Strict Stance on Crypto Participation in Regulatory Sandbox

Crypto Exchange CEO and Siblings Sentenced to Over 11,000 Years in Prison

Ripple’s Chief Legal Officer Lambasts SEC’s ‘Contradictory Shift’ in Latest Submission

/

Stuart Alderoty, Ripple’s chief legal officer and general counsel involved in the SEC vs. Ripple Labs case, has labeled the SEC’s most recent submission as a “contradictory shift,” asserting that it carries little weight.

In response to the SEC’s recent filing to bolster its interlocutory appeal, Alderoty took to X (formerly Twitter) to characterize the submission as yet another instance of a “hypocritical pivot.”

Within his statement, Alderoty pointed out what he perceives as inconsistencies in SEC Chair Gary Gensler’s stance, citing manipulative actions and a desire for increased regulation.

Alderoty emphasized that despite Gensler’s prior assertion that cryptocurrency regulations were clear and non-negotiable for the industry, the SEC now urgently seeks an appeal to address complex legal issues.

READ MORE: Crypto Exchange CEO and Siblings Sentenced to Over 11,000 Years in Prison

Another attorney, James Filan, took a swipe at the SEC, mocking its newfound concern for conserving judicial resources and highlighting the SEC’s previous attempt to halt proceedings in the case.

Pro-XRP lawyer John Deaton noted that, to those unfamiliar with the case, Alderoty’s response might seem harsh; however, among those well-versed in the matter, it merely reflects the sentiments of the federal judge overseeing the proceedings.

In the Grayscale lawsuit, federal judges have criticized the SEC’s claims as “arbitrary and capricious.”

Furthermore, Ripple’s executive chairman, Chris Larsen, anticipates that the SEC’s strategy of enforcing regulations through legal actions may soon reach a conclusion in the near future.

Other Stories:

Block Earner Forges Ahead with Crypto-Backed Loans Despite Legal Battle with Regulator

Singapore’s MAS Maintains Strict Stance on Crypto Participation in Regulatory Sandbox

Ant Group Unveils ZAN Sub-Brand for Web3 Blockchain Development Services

Blockchain IP Ownership Network Secures $54 Million Funding Round with High-Profile Investors

Story Protocol, a groundbreaking blockchain-based IP ownership network, has successfully closed a significant funding round, securing $54 million in investments as of September 7th.

Notably, this round saw participation from prominent figures in the industry, including 11:11 Media, owned by Paris Hilton, and the renowned venture capital firm Andreessen Horowitz, often referred to as a16z.

Story Protocol leverages the power of blockchain technology to offer content creators an effective means of managing and monetizing their creations in the face of ever-increasing AI-generated fakes.

Its primary mission is to establish itself as a robust blockchain-based repository for intellectual property ownership across various content formats, encompassing text, images, and audio.

For artists who choose to register on the platform, an array of interconnected services will be at their disposal, enabling them to license their content for diverse purposes.

Seung-yoon Lee, another co-founder of Story Protocol, anticipates a surge in remixed content generated by AI in the near future, emphasizing the pressing need for transparent provenance tracking and fair attribution—a challenge that blockchain technology is uniquely positioned to address.

The funding round was spearheaded by Andreessen Horowitz, which not only provided financial backing but also secured equity in Story Protocol, along with the option to purchase digital tokens should they be issued by the company, as confirmed by a company spokesperson.

Story Protocol also garnered support from prominent entities like Hashed, Endeavor, Samsung Next, and David Bonderman, the founder of TPG Capital.

READ MORE:Synapse (SYN) Token Price Dives Over 20% as Liquidity Provider’s Sell-Off Shakes DeFi Cross-Chain Bridge

Jashon Zhao, co-founder of the company, outlined their plans to utilize these funds for the anticipated launch slated for the first half of 2024.

In the ever-evolving landscape of the entertainment industry, combating deep fakes and copyright infringements facilitated by generative AI has become a paramount concern. Universal Music Group (UMG) has taken a proactive stance, urging streaming platforms like Spotify to be vigilant in removing content that infringes on copyrighted work.

Following this call to action, Spotify promptly ramped up its content policing efforts, actively purging any material that violated copyright regulations.

Furthermore, recent reports have unveiled negotiations between UMG and Google concerning the management of deep fakes and the optimal licensing framework for melodies and vocal tracks that can be harnessed in AI-generated compositions.

This ongoing battle underscores the critical role that platforms like Story Protocol play in safeguarding intellectual property and ensuring fair compensation for creators in a rapidly evolving digital landscape.

Other Stories:

Federal Judge Freezes Assets and Property of Former Celsius CEO Alex Mashinsky

Japanese Financial Regulator FSA Proposes Tax Code Overhaul for Crypto Assets

Legal Industry Rakes in Over $700 Million from Cryptocurrency Bankruptcies

Pro-XRP Lawyer Outlines Potential Settlement Scenarios Amid Ripple-SEC Speculation

/

Amidst ongoing speculation surrounding a possible resolution between Ripple and the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), attorney John Deaton, a staunch advocate for the pro-XRP camp, has outlined potential courses of action that may unfold if the two parties decide to reach a settlement.

Drawing attention to the ongoing legal battle between Coinbase and the SEC, Deaton underscored the significance of the situation.

He elucidated that should the judge presiding over the Coinbase case grant the motion to dismiss put forth by the exchange, it would signal that transactions involving tokens on the platform aren’t subject to U.S. securities regulations.

It’s important to note, however, that this ruling would not extend to crypto staking activities.

In his words:

“The scenario in which Ripple and the SEC could potentially settle before the year’s end hinges on Judge Failla granting Coinbase’s motion to dismiss or partially granting it.

This would involve a determination that token sales occurring on an exchange through blind bid/ask transactions fall outside the purview of U.S. securities laws.”

Should the motion to dismiss receive approval, the SEC’s scope for pursuing an appeal would be substantially limited, thereby making the prospect of a settlement a plausible option.

READ MORE: Robinhood Acquires Over 55 Million Shares From Former FTX CEO SBF in $606 Million Deal

Deaton further clarified that even if the possibility of an appeal remained viable in such circumstances, the agency’s authority would be significantly curtailed.

Ripple’s recent filing on September 1 revealed that the summary judgment had not adequately addressed the foundational basis for an interlocutory appeal.

The opposition from Ripple stemmed from the argument that the SEC had deviated from established legal interpretations, particularly in relation to the application of the Howey test to sales of XRP tokens.

In December 2020, the SEC launched a lawsuit against Ripple, its CEO Brad Garlinghouse, and co-founder Chris Larsen, resulting in the removal of XRP from several exchanges to preempt potential legal ramifications.

However, a favorable ruling by Judge Analisa Torres in July prompted numerous exchanges to express their intentions to relist the XRP token.

Throughout 2023, the SEC has pursued various cryptocurrency firms on allegations of violating securities regulations, including prominent entities such as Binance and Coinbase.

Recent developments saw asset management company Grayscale achieve a legal victory over the SEC through an appeal, compelling a reevaluation of its application for a Bitcoin exchange-traded fund.

Other Stories:

Crypto Community Joins Forces with Oprah and The Rock

UK MPs Call for Global Alliance to Safeguard Against AI Misuse and Deepfakes

Bitwise Surprises Market by Withdrawing Bitcoin and Ether ETF Application Amid SEC Delays

Pro-XRP Lawyer Outlines Potential Ripple-SEC Settlement Amid Coinbase Legal Battle

/

Amid ongoing speculation regarding a potential resolution between Ripple and the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC),

John Deaton, a prominent advocate for XRP and proponent of its legality, has outlined potential steps that Ripple and the SEC might take if they decide to pursue a settlement.

Deaton emphasized the importance of the ongoing legal battle between Coinbase and the SEC.

He pointed out that if the judge overseeing the Coinbase case grants the exchange’s motion to dismiss, it could establish a precedent indicating that token sales conducted on exchanges might not fall under U.S. securities regulations.

However, Deaton clarified that such a ruling would not necessarily apply to cryptocurrency staking activities.

In his analysis, Deaton stated, “The only plausible scenario for a Ripple-SEC settlement before year-end would be if Judge Failla endorses the Coinbase motion or partially approves it, signifying that token sales executed on an exchange, involving blind bid/ask transactions, may not be subject to U.S. securities regulations.”

Should the motion to dismiss receive approval, the SEC’s ability to pursue an appeal would be substantially limited, making a settlement a pragmatic consideration.

Deaton further explained that even if the SEC were to pursue an appeal in this context, its regulatory authority would likely be diminished.

READ MORE: Ripple Challenges SEC’s Appeal Bid, Asserting Insufficient Grounds in Ongoing Lawsuit

In a recent filing on September 1, Ripple indicated that the summary judgment failed to adequately address the legal foundation for an interlocutory appeal.

Ripple’s opposition to the judgment was rooted in its argument that the SEC had deviated from established legal norms, particularly with regard to applying the Howey test to determine whether XRP token sales qualify as securities.

The SEC had originally filed a lawsuit against Ripple, CEO Brad Garlinghouse, and co-founder Chris Larsen in December 2020, triggering several exchanges to delist XRP to avoid potential legal liabilities.

However, a favorable ruling by Judge Analisa Torres in July led numerous exchanges to express their intentions to relist the XRP token.

Throughout 2023, the SEC has pursued various cryptocurrency firms over allegations of securities violations, including notable names like Binance and Coinbase.

Notably, on August 29, asset manager Grayscale achieved a legal victory against the SEC through an appeal, compelling a reevaluation of its application for a Bitcoin exchange-traded fund in the spot market.

Other Stories:

MakerDAO Co-Founder Proposes Solana Codebase for NewChain, Diverging from Ethereum Affiliation

Former SEC Chair Expresses Confidence in Eventual Approval of Spot Bitcoin ETFs

Warren Buffett’s Strategy vs. Bitcoin: Analyzing Performance and Potential in a Shifting Landscape

Ripple Challenges SEC’s Appeal Bid, Asserting Insufficient Grounds in Ongoing Lawsuit

Ripple’s legal representatives, amidst the ongoing legal battle with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), have put forth a contention suggesting that the regulatory body lacks the necessary grounds to pursue an appeal.

The legal team for Ripple filed a document on September 1 with the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, asserting that the SEC’s motivation for seeking an appeal predominantly stems from dissatisfaction with a judge’s prior decision.

This decision had ruled that the XRP token did not meet the criteria to be classified as a security in relation to sales directed at retail investors.

Ripple’s lawyers emphasized that the requisites for an “interlocutory appeal,” which demands exceptional circumstances, are conspicuously absent in this particular case.

The legal representatives urged the presiding judge to dismiss any request for an appeal or a stay based on these grounds.

In unity with the Individual Defendants, who are also part of the lawsuit, Ripple vociferously opposed the SEC’s appeal request.

This development follows a sequence of events where the SEC attempted to contest and postpone a July ruling by Judge Analisa Torres.

The July decision concluded that XRP did not primarily qualify as a security as outlined by the SEC’s guidelines.

READ MORE: OKX Cryptocurrency Exchange Expands into India, Focusing on Web3 Potential and Local Talent

The regulatory agency had then asserted that substantial differences of opinion on the relevant laws justified their pursuit of an appeal.

The lawsuit, initially initiated by the SEC against Ripple, CEO Brad Garlinghouse, and co-founder Chris Larsen in December 2020, led to a wave of delistings of the XRP token from various exchanges.

However, Judge Torres’ subsequent ruling prompted some of these exchanges to consider relisting the token in light of the evolving legal situation.

Brad Garlinghouse expressed disappointment with the need for legal action to rectify what he perceives as the SEC’s flawed understanding of facts and regulations within the U.S. cryptocurrency community.

Throughout 2023, the SEC has been actively pursuing various cryptocurrency entities for alleged securities violations, including prominent platforms like Binance and Coinbase.

In a recent victory for the cryptocurrency industry, asset management firm Grayscale achieved success in court against the SEC.

An appeal prompted the court to mandate a review of Grayscale’s application for a Bitcoin exchange-traded fund (ETF).

As the legal proceedings between the SEC and Ripple continue, Judge Torres has proposed a jury trial slated to commence in the second quarter of 2024.

Other Stories:

Ronaldinho Denies Involvement in Alleged $61 Million Crypto Pyramid Scheme

Ethereum Liquid Staking Providers Embrace 22% Cap to Safeguard Decentralization

US Crypto Industry Sees Hope in Court Rulings Restraining SEC

Former SEC Chair Expresses Confidence in Eventual Approval of Spot Bitcoin ETFs

/

Former chair of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), Jay Clayton, remains optimistic about the eventual approval of spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs), despite recent delays in decision-making.

In a recent interview with CNBC on September 1st, Clayton noted that the backing of major financial institutions in the realm of spot Bitcoin investments signals a notable shift in providing retail investors with access to cryptocurrency exposure.

The SEC’s recent move to extend the review period for various spot BTC ETF applications from prominent entities such as BlackRock, WisdomTree, VanEck, Invesco Galaxy, Bitwise, Valkyrie, and Fidelity, was observed on August 31st.

This extension grants the commission an additional 45 days, following the notice’s publication in the Federal Register, to either approve, reject, or further delay the ETF applications from these influential firms.

Clayton expressed his belief in the forward momentum of these efforts, indicating that progress can be expected as the process unfolds.

The SEC retains the flexibility to extend the application deadlines until March 2024.

READ MORE: Bitwise Surprises Market by Withdrawing Bitcoin and Ether ETF Application Amid SEC Delays

Clayton emphasized that he envisions an “inevitable” approval for spot Bitcoin ETFs, highlighting the disparity between futures products and cash products, and asserting that this divergence cannot persist indefinitely.

Notably, Clayton’s viewpoint resonates with that of U.S. Court of Appeals Circuit Judge Neomi Rao.

In a recent ruling, Rao and two other judges directed the SEC to reevaluate the application of asset manager Grayscale, seeking to transform its Bitcoin Trust (GBTC) into a spot Bitcoin ETF.

Rao highlighted that the SEC had previously greenlit BTC futures ETFs, implying a similarity between Grayscale’s proposition and the approved futures products.

The sequence of ETF application delays took place in rapid succession on August 31st, just prior to the Labor Day holiday weekend in the United States.

The following key deadline for the assessment of significant spot BTC applications is scheduled for October 7th, at which point the commission is expected to provide updates regarding the proposed offering from fund manager Global X.

Other Stories:

Robinhood Acquires Over 55 Million Shares From Former FTX CEO SBF in $606 Million Deal

UK MPs Call for Global Alliance to Safeguard Against AI Misuse and Deepfakes

Crypto Community Joins Forces with Oprah and The Rock

1 45 46 47 48 49 344