SEC - Page 42

3438 result(s) found.

Paxos Secures Initial Approval from MAS for U.S. Dollar-Backed Stablecoin Launch in Singapore

/

Paxos, a prominent crypto infrastructure company, has achieved preliminary approval from Singapore’s regulatory authority for the establishment of a new entity dedicated to launching a stablecoin backed by the U.S. dollar.

In an announcement made on November 15th, Paxos revealed that it had received an initial endorsement from the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) for its newly formed entity, Paxos Digital Singapore Pte. Ltd.

This new entity is authorized to provide digital payment token services and has intentions to introduce a stablecoin denominated in U.S. dollars, which will comply with MAS’ forthcoming stablecoin regulations.

Upon obtaining full regulatory approval, Paxos intends to collaborate with enterprise clients to facilitate the issuance of the stablecoin within Singapore.

Walter Hessert, Paxos’ head of strategy, emphasized the increasing global demand for the U.S. dollar while acknowledging the challenges faced by consumers outside the United States in accessing dollars securely, reliably, and with regulatory safeguards.

He noted that the in-principle approval from MAS would enable Paxos to extend its regulated platform to a broader international user base.

READ MORE: Global Tech Giants Unveil Ambitious Plan After Poloniex Hack

The Monetary Authority of Singapore previously outlined its regulatory framework for stablecoins on August 15th.

This framework is designed to oversee stablecoins linked to the Singapore dollar or major G10 currencies like the euro, British pound, and U.S. dollar, provided their circulation exceeds 5 million Singapore dollars ($3.7 million).

On August 7th, PayPal launched its own USD-backed stablecoin, PYUSD, which was issued by Paxos.

It’s worth mentioning that Paxos had previously minted Binance’s BUSD stablecoin, but it was compelled by the New York Department of Financial Services to cease issuing the token due to the agency’s classification of it as an unregistered security.

Paxos clarified that all of its stablecoins are fully backed by U.S. dollars and cash equivalents, underscoring their commitment to compliance.

They further highlighted their practice of issuing monthly attestations and reserve reports to ensure transparency and regulatory adherence.

This commitment to regulatory compliance aligns with Paxos’ mission to provide a reliable and secure platform for the issuance of stablecoins, catering to the growing global demand for the U.S. dollar.

Discover the Crypto Intelligence Blockchain Council

Solana Labs Disputes Security Claims Regarding Saga Phone Made by CertiK

/

Blockchain security firm CertiK recently released a video that raised concerns about a potential security vulnerability in Solana’s crypto-enabled Saga phone.

CertiK claimed that the Saga phone contained a “critical vulnerability” known as a “bootloader unlock” attack, which they suggested could allow malicious actors to install a hidden backdoor in the device.

They further asserted that this could compromise sensitive data, including cryptocurrency private keys.

In response, Solana Labs disputed CertiK’s claims, stating that the video did not reveal any legitimate threat to the Saga device.

According to Solana Labs, unlocking the bootloader and installing custom firmware would require multiple steps, which can only be performed after unlocking the device with the user’s passcode or fingerprint.

Additionally, unlocking the bootloader would result in the device being wiped, a process that users are made aware of through multiple warnings.

READ MORE: Kazakhstan’s Chairman Conducts Historic Transaction with Digital Tenge

This means that the process cannot take place without the user’s active participation and awareness.

The Solana Saga phone, initially priced at $1,099 when it was released in April 2022, aimed to provide users with a Web3-native decentralized application store, integrating cryptocurrency applications into the device’s hardware.

However, four months after its launch, Solana reduced the phone’s price to $599 due to a decline in sales.

It is essential to note that CertiK’s claims and Solana Labs’ response highlight the ongoing debates and discussions within the blockchain and crypto industry regarding security vulnerabilities and their potential impact on users.

While concerns about security should not be dismissed, Solana Labs has argued that the claimed vulnerability is not as straightforward to exploit as initially suggested by CertiK.

As the industry continues to evolve, maintaining robust security standards and addressing potential threats remains a priority for both companies and users in the crypto space.

Discover the Crypto Intelligence Blockchain Council

Hex Trust Secures Regulatory Approval to Offer Cryptocurrency Custodial Services in Dubai

/

Hong Kong-based institutional cryptocurrency asset custodian, Hex Trust, has received approval to offer virtual asset custodial services to institutional clients and investors in Dubai.

The company, which established its Dubai office in June 2022, obtained a full virtual asset service provider (VASP) license from Dubai’s Virtual Asset Regulatory Authority (VARA) on November 15.

Initially, Hex Trust had received a minimal viable product (MVP) operations license in February 2023, and this recent approval allows the firm to fully operate in the jurisdiction.

Hex Trust’s MENA regional director, Filippo Buzzi, highlighted that this approval places the company among a select group of cryptocurrency exchanges and service providers allowed to operate in Dubai.

Buzzi expressed Hex Trust’s commitment to expanding into the Middle East, citing the region’s progressive regulations, supportive governments, and thriving crypto ecosystem as factors contributing to its growth potential.

Alessio Quaglini, Hex Trust’s co-founder and CEO, emphasized that Dubai offers an ideal environment for businesses in the cryptocurrency sector to thrive, thanks to its progressive regulatory approach.

In addition to Dubai, Hex Trust has also received regulatory approval in France to provide its services to companies in the country, marking another milestone in its global expansion.

The company currently has offices in Hong Kong, Singapore, Vietnam, Dubai, Italy, and France.

READ MORE: Global Leaders Gather at APEC Summit in San Francisco to Discuss Economy and Digital Assets

Furthermore, Hex Trust recently gained recognition as one of the four major cryptocurrency custodians integrated into MetaMask Institutional’s wallet and browser extension, enabling it to offer custodial services to institutional clients.

This announcement coincided with Crypto.com’s Dubai entity receiving its VASP license, which is still pending operational approval from the city’s regulator.

Hex Trust joins a list of prominent cryptocurrency exchanges and firms that have obtained MVP or VASP licenses in Dubai, including Binance, Bybit, Laser Digital Middle East, BitOasis (currently suspended), OKX, Crypto.com, FTX (license revoked), and Huobi.

Komainu, a joint venture involving Nomura, and crypto companies CoinShares and Ledger, also secured a full VASP license in August 2023, offering custodial and staking services to institutional-grade clients.

The United Arab Emirates’ continued attraction to cryptocurrency ecosystem participants is driven by its role in providing federal grants and fostering crypto-friendly regulations.

To obtain a VARA license in Dubai, crypto exchanges must go through a three-step process, which includes qualifying for provisional approval, obtaining an MVP license, and finally securing a full market product license.

Discover the Crypto Intelligence Blockchain Council

Decentralized Stablecoin Protocol Raft Loses $6.7 Million in Security Exploit Despite Multiple Audits

/

Despite undergoing multiple security audits, Raft, a decentralized U.S. dollar stablecoin protocol, recently fell victim to a security breach resulting in a substantial loss of $6.7 million.

The incident, detailed in a post-mortem report released on November 13th, involved a hacker who had borrowed 6,000 Coinbase-wrapped staked Ether (cbETH) from the decentralized finance platform Aave.

This borrowed cbETH was then transferred to Raft, where the attacker exploited a smart contract glitch to mint an astonishing 6.7 million R tokens, which constitute Raft’s stablecoin.

The ill-gotten funds were promptly funneled off the platform through liquidity pools on decentralized exchanges Balancer and Uniswap, ultimately yielding the hacker $3.6 million in gains.

The attack had a detrimental impact on the R stablecoin’s peg to the U.S. dollar.

The post-mortem report identified the primary cause of the incident as a precision calculation issue when minting share tokens, enabling the attacker to amass extra share tokens.

The attacker capitalized on the amplified index value, significantly boosting the value of their shares.

This security lapse went unnoticed despite the smart contracts having undergone audits by blockchain security firms Trail of Bits and Hats Finance, highlighting the unfortunate inability of these audits to detect the vulnerabilities that led to the breach.

READ MORE: Spanish Regulator Takes Action Against Fraudulent Crypto Promoters

In response to the incident, Raft has taken a series of measures.

They have filed a police report and are collaborating with centralized exchanges to trace the flow of the stolen funds.

Currently, all of Raft’s smart contracts remain suspended. However, users who had minted R tokens still have the option to settle their positions and recover their collateral.

This event serves as another sobering reminder of the ongoing challenges and risks associated with decentralized stablecoins.

It underscores the critical importance of implementing robust security measures and maintaining vigilance within the DeFi space.

This incident is not an isolated case within the decentralized stablecoin realm.

In December 2022, the decentralized stablecoin HAY also experienced a depegging from the U.S. dollar due to a hacker exploiting a smart contract glitch, enabling them to mint 16 million HAY tokens without proper collateral.

HAY has since managed to reestablish its peg, partly due to the protocol’s requirement of a collateralization ratio of 152% at the time of the exploit, which served as a risk management safeguard.

Discover the Crypto Intelligence Blockchain Council

BlackRock Challenges SEC’s Treatment of Spot-Crypto and Crypto-Futures ETFs

/

BlackRock, a leading global investment management firm, has raised concerns about the treatment of spot-crypto and crypto-futures exchange-traded fund (ETF) applications by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

BlackRock recently confirmed its plan to launch a spot-Ether (ETH) ETF called the “iShares Ethereum Trust.”

The firm’s application, submitted by Nasdaq on November 9 through the 19b-4 form, questions the SEC’s handling of spot crypto ETFs, arguing that the agency’s reasons for consistently denying these applications are based on incorrect regulatory distinctions between futures and spot ETFs.

The SEC has not yet approved any spot-crypto ETF applications but has granted approval to several crypto futures ETFs.

The SEC has cited the supposedly superior regulation and consumer protections provided under the 1940 Act for crypto futures ETFs, in contrast to the 1933 Act that covers spot-crypto ETFs.

The agency also appears to favor regulatory and surveillance-sharing agreements with the Chicago Mercantile Exchange’s (CME) digital asset futures market.

READ MORE: Nigeria and Raspberry Pi Foundation Collaborate to Launch Code Clubs

BlackRock disputes the relevance of the SEC’s preference for the 1940 Act, arguing that it places restrictions on ETFs and ETF sponsors rather than on the underlying assets of the ETFs.

The firm contends that the distinction between the registration of ETH futures ETFs under the 1940 Act and spot ETH ETPs under the 1933 Act is essentially meaningless in the context of ETH-based ETP proposals.

BlackRock emphasizes that since the SEC has approved crypto futures ETFs via the CME, it has effectively acknowledged the CME’s ability to detect spot-market fraud that could impact spot ETPs.

Therefore, BlackRock believes that the SEC lacks a justifiable reason to reject its spot-Ether ETF application under its current regulatory framework.

Many crypto and ETF analysts anticipate that the first SEC approval of a spot crypto ETF, possibly related to Bitcoin, is imminent.

Bloomberg ETF analysts James Seyffart and Eric Balchunas even predict a 90% chance of approval before January 10 of the following year, signaling the potential expansion of the crypto ETF market.

Discover the Crypto Intelligence Blockchain Council

Attorney Makes Strong Case Against $770 Million Disgorgement in Ripple vs. SEC Legal Battle

/

Attorney John Deaton, who represents XRP holders in the ongoing legal battle between Ripple and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), has presented a compelling argument suggesting that the expected $770 million disgorgement penalty against Ripple is highly unlikely.

Deaton’s case is built on several key factors that could influence the court’s decision in favor of Ripple.

A critical point in Deaton’s argument is the Supreme Court’s Morrison ruling, which restricts the SEC’s jurisdiction to sales conducted within the United States.

This is particularly significant as Ripple’s XRP sales in various international markets, including the United Kingdom, Japan, and Switzerland, are currently under scrutiny. Importantly, the legal status of XRP in these foreign jurisdictions supports Ripple’s position.

For instance, regulatory authorities such as the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) in the United Kingdom and the Financial Services Agency (FSA) in Japan have not classified XRP as a security.

This classification is crucial because it allows for the legal continuation of XRP sales in these regions, presenting a significant challenge to the SEC’s pursuit of disgorgement for global transactions.

Furthermore, Deaton emphasizes that the legal action against Ripple is primarily a regulatory dispute rather than a fraud case.

READ MORE: SafeMoon CEO’s Bail Release on Hold Amid Flight Risk Concerns

This distinction is essential as it shifts the focus away from punitive measures towards regulatory compliance.

Since a substantial portion of XRP sales occurs outside the United States and involves accredited investors, the potential for disgorgement decreases significantly.

By excluding non-U.S. sales, which may account for more than 90% of total sales and sales to accredited investors, Deaton predicts a substantial reduction in the potential disgorgement amount.

Additionally, Deaton points out that most institutional XRP sales have not resulted in investor losses, as the current XRP price surpasses the levels during those sales.

This suggests that investors have not suffered harm. Deaton also highlights the rapid nature of On-Demand Liquidity (ODL) transactions involving XRP, which occur within seconds, further reducing the potential for investor harm.

Interestingly, accusations of harm are more directed towards the SEC than Ripple, especially among the 75,000 XRP holders involved in the legal action.

In conclusion, Attorney John Deaton’s argument underscores the complexities of the Ripple vs. SEC case, highlighting legal precedents, international regulatory differences, and the nature of XRP transactions.

His persuasive case raises doubts about the likelihood of the SEC securing the anticipated $770 million disgorgement penalty against Ripple, potentially reshaping the outcome of this legal saga.

Discover the Crypto Intelligence Blockchain Council

Bitwise Asset Management Disassociates Itself from Troubled Firm Amidst SEC Charges

Bitwise Asset Management, a leading crypto index fund manager, is keen to clarify that it has absolutely no ties to the troubled tech startup, Bitwise Industries, currently facing legal troubles brought forth by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

The co-founders of Bitwise Industries, Irma Olguin Jr. and Jake Soberal, have been slapped with charges of wire fraud conspiracy and alleged misappropriation of $100 million from various investors, despite their faltering business model.

The SEC claims that they went to great lengths, including falsifying documents, to deceive investors and secure funds.

The resemblance in the names of the two entities has led to some confusion, with social media posts erroneously using Bitwise Asset Management’s logo when discussing Bitwise Industries.

However, Bitwise Asset Management is eager to make it abundantly clear that there is no connection between the two.

READ MORE: Cardano’s ‘Boring’ Approach Proves to be a Pillar of Strength in Blockchain Evolution

In a statement issued on November 10th, Bitwise Asset Management unequivocally asserted their independence from the beleaguered tech firm, stating, “San Francisco-based Bitwise Asset Management, Inc., the largest crypto index fund manager in America, has no relationship with, and has never had a relationship with, the now-defunct Bitwise Industries, a former technology company based in Fresno, California.”

Bitwise Asset Management is renowned for its diverse range of crypto-related investment products, which include Ether futures exchange-traded funds (ETFs).

Additionally, the company is actively pursuing approval for a spot Bitcoin ETF, positioning itself at the forefront of the evolving cryptocurrency investment landscape.

In stark contrast, Bitwise Industries seems to be a defunct tech company with no history of involvement in digital assets or cryptocurrencies.

The distinction between the two entities is paramount, especially given the legal issues surrounding Bitwise Industries, and Bitwise Asset Management is determined to ensure that this distinction is crystal clear to the public and investors alike.

Discover the Crypto Intelligence Blockchain Council

President Biden’s Executive Order Sets New AI Safety Standards for a Secure Future

On October 30, President Joe Biden issued a comprehensive executive order aimed at safeguarding citizens, government entities, and companies by establishing stringent artificial intelligence (AI) safety standards.

This order introduces six new standards for AI safety and security, along with promoting ethical AI utilization within government agencies, all in alignment with the principles of “safety, security, trust, openness.”

Among its mandates, the executive order mandates the sharing of safety test results with officials for companies developing “foundation models posing significant risks to national security, economic security, or public health.”

It also emphasizes the acceleration of privacy-preserving techniques in AI development. However, the absence of specific implementation details has raised concerns in the industry about potential implications for top-tier model development.

Adam Struck, a founding partner at Struck Capital and an AI investor, highlighted the order’s seriousness in recognizing AI’s transformative potential across industries.

Yet, he noted the challenges faced by developers in predicting future risks based on assumptions about products that are not fully developed, particularly in the open-source community where the order lacks clear directives.

However, Struck also mentioned that the administration’s intention to manage these guidelines through AI chiefs and governance boards within regulatory agencies implies that companies operating within those agencies should adhere to regulatory frameworks that the government finds acceptable, emphasizing data compliance, privacy, and unbiased algorithms.

READ MORE: FTX Seeks Court Approval to Sell $744 Million in Trust Assets Amid Bankruptcy Proceedings

The government has already disclosed more than 700 use cases demonstrating its internal use of AI through the “ai.gov” website.

Martin Casado, a general partner at venture capital firm Andreessen Horowitz, expressed concerns about the executive order’s potential impact on open-source AI.

He, along with other AI researchers, academics, and founders, sent a letter to the Biden administration, asserting that open source is crucial to ensuring software remains safe and free from monopolies.

The letter criticized the order’s broad definitions of certain AI model types and raised concerns about smaller companies facing challenges in meeting requirements designed for larger firms.

Jeff Amico of Gensyn echoed these sentiments, calling the order detrimental to innovation in the U.S.

Matthew Putman, CEO and co-founder of Nanotronics, a global leader in AI-enabled manufacturing, stressed the need for regulatory frameworks that prioritize consumer safety and ethical AI development.

He urged regulators to consider the potential for overregulation, drawing parallels with the cryptocurrency industry.

Putman also emphasized that the fears of AI’s catastrophic potential are exaggerated, as the technology is more likely to bring positive impacts than destructive outcomes.

He pointed out that innovative AI applications, especially in advanced manufacturing, biotech, and energy, are driving a sustainability revolution with improved processes that reduce waste and emissions.

While the executive order is still fresh, the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology and the Department of Commerce have initiated the Artificial Intelligence Safety Institute Consortium, seeking members to contribute to AI safety efforts.

Discover the Crypto Intelligence Blockchain Council

Hong Kong Regulator Sets Guidelines for Tokenized Securities and Investment Products

On November 2, the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) of Hong Kong unveiled a comprehensive set of business requirements pertaining to the issuance of tokenized securities and other investment products.

This initiative was driven by the growing market demand for tokenized investment products in Hong Kong, coupled with the manifold advantages of blockchain technology.

The SFC’s circular delineates 12 key points, with a primary focus on four crucial aspects: tokenization arrangements, disclosure practices, intermediaries involved, and the competence of personnel, all of which are deemed essential for entities seeking eligibility to offer tokenized securities-related activities.

The primary motivation behind the tokenization of SFC-authorized investment products is the surging market demand, paralleled with the government’s determination to foster market expansion.

As long as the underlying product complies with all applicable product authorization prerequisites and incorporates additional safeguards to address associated risks, the SFC expressed its endorsement of the “primary dealing of tokenized SFC-authorized investment products” through a transparent approach.

Providers entering this domain are obligated to shoulder full responsibility for their tokenized offerings. This entails ensuring robust record-keeping mechanisms, operational soundness, and the implementation of effective controls.

READ MORE: FTX Seeks Court Approval to Sell $744 Million in Trust Assets Amid Bankruptcy Proceedings

The SFC has made it abundantly clear that “Product Providers should not use public-permissionless blockchain networks without additional and proper controls.”

Regarding disclosure requisites, providers are mandated to transparently specify whether settlements occur off-chain or on-chain, and they must continuously validate token ownership.

Moreover, the SFC stipulates that providers must have at least one proficient staff member equipped with relevant experience and expertise to oversee the tokenization process and manage the new risks associated with ownership and technology.

In spite of federal endeavors to encourage the tokenization of investment products, interest in cryptocurrencies among Hong Kong residents has seen a notable decline.

According to a survey conducted by the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology’s business school, the infamous $166-million JPEX scandal has cast a shadow over investor sentiment, with 41% of the 5,700 respondents expressing a reluctance to hold digital assets.

This suggests that while regulatory frameworks are evolving to accommodate tokenized securities, the scars of past crypto-related incidents continue to influence investment decisions among the local populace.

Discover the Crypto Intelligence Blockchain Council

US Lawmaker Proposes Cutting SEC Chair’s Salary to $1

A US lawmaker, Representative Tim Burchett, has put forth a bold proposal to slash Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Chair Gary Gensler’s salary to a mere $1 per year as part of a broader plan to defund the regulatory agency.

This proposition is contained in an amendment to the Financial Services and General Government (FSGG) bill, a comprehensive piece of legislation introduced on July 13, with the aim of substantially reducing government expenditures across various sectors.

Currently, Gary Gensler receives an annual salary estimated to exceed $300,000 for his role as SEC Chair. Burchett’s move is not isolated, as the FSGG bill seeks to curtail funding for multiple government agencies.

Representative Steve Womack, while presenting the bill to the House Rules Committee on November 6, argued that the SEC and other agencies had become victims of regulatory overreach, placing an excessive financial burden on the government.

Womack’s perspective is that defunding the SEC would serve as a means to curtail its regulatory “intrusiveness” and refocus the agency on its primary mission.

READ MORE: Bitcoin ETF Anticipation Sparks Resurgence in Blockchain Gaming Enthusiasm

He stressed, “Specifically, we turn off rulemakings at the Securities and Exchange Commission that lack proper cost-benefit analysis and aggregate impact analysis.”

He also acknowledged the importance of the agencies under their jurisdiction but criticized their deviation from their intended mandates, asserting that such deviations have been detrimental to the American public.

It’s worth noting that this isn’t the first instance of Gary Gensler and the SEC facing criticism from US politicians.

Back on June 12, US Representatives Warren Davidson and Tom Emmer introduced the SEC Stabilization Act to the House of Representatives.

One of the key provisions of this bill aimed to oust Gensler from his position as SEC Chair, redistributing the agency’s power between the chair and commissioners.

Additionally, it proposed the creation of an executive director role and the addition of a sixth commissioner to prevent any single political party from holding a majority influence.

Davidson and Emmer have been vocal critics of Gensler’s leadership at the SEC, with Emmer characterizing him as a “bad faith regulator” and accusing him of disproportionately targeting the crypto community with enforcement actions while neglecting more significant wrongdoers.

These ongoing debates and legislative efforts reflect the contentious atmosphere surrounding the SEC’s role and leadership within the US government.

Discover the Crypto Intelligence Blockchain Council

1 40 41 42 43 44 344