SEC - Page 267

The United States Senate recently approved the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), a crucial law determining the agenda and funding for the Department of Defense.

The bill allocates an impressive $886 billion for federal defense, coupled with a 5.2% pay increase for service members.

Beyond its focus on funding, the NDAA has far-reaching implications, extending its influence into various industries, including the digital asset ecosystem.

Of particular interest to the cryptocurrency community is the bill’s targeting of privacy coins and crypto mixers.

These tools have the potential to obscure users’ identities and make it challenging for authorities to track blockchain transactions, facilitating crypto-related fraud.

Senators Elizabeth Warren, Roger Marshall, Cynthia Lummis, and Kirsten Gillibrand were among the proponents of a cryptocurrency amendment in the bill, aimed at reducing fraudulent activities within the crypto space.

The NDAA empowers authorities to bolster crypto regulations across the board, especially regarding the operation of virtual asset services and the assessment of risks involved.

The legislation also empowers the Treasury Department to crack down on anonymous crypto transactions facilitated by certain companies, specifically addressing money laundering and related offenses.

Crypto mixers, such as Tornado Cash, and privacy coins have faced criticism from authorities for enabling money laundering and illicit fund movements.

READ MORE: 3 Best Crypto Projects That Will Boom In 2023 & The Next Bull Run

Last year, the Treasury Department imposed sanctions on Tornado Cash following a major theft involving the Lazarus Group, a North Korean-associated company.

The NDAA also tackles compliance among stablecoin issuers, sparking debates across social media spaces.

The bill is expected to increase Know Your Customer (KYC) and Anti-Money Laundering (AML) regulations for stablecoin firms, many of which are currently operating without stringent requirements.

Critics fear that the bill may limit the use of stablecoins, giving the government more power, while supporters argue that it will protect investors and prevent illegal transactions, ultimately instilling greater confidence in the investor community.

Furthermore, the NDAA will require US companies to disclose their investments in China, with Senator Bob Casey stressing the importance of understanding the depth of “critical technology being transferred to adversaries.”

In conclusion, the NDAA’s passage has brought significant changes to various sectors, including the digital asset industry.

By targeting privacy coins, crypto mixers, and stablecoin issuers, the bill aims to reduce fraud and increase transparency in the cryptocurrency space.

While the implications of these regulations are still subject to debate, their potential impact on investor confidence and the overall stability of the industry remains to be seen.

Other Stories:

SEC and Binance Oppose Eeon’s Intervention in Crypto Exchange Lawsuit

Revealed: The Best Crypto Marketing & PR Agency

Why Didn’t Bitcoin (BTC) Enter a New Rally?

Heartland Tri-State Bank of Elkhart, part of the ongoing crisis in the U.S. banking system, was closed on July 29 by the Kansas Office of the State Bank Commissioner, and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) took control.

The FDIC stated that on July 31, the bank’s four branches would reopen as branches of Dream First Bank during regular business hours.

Depositors of the failed bank would become customers of Dream First Bank, and all transactions, including withdrawals, deposits, and loans, would be processed through the acquiring bank.

Customers were advised to use their existing branch location until the transition was complete.

This collapse marked the second bank crisis of the week, following the merger of PacWest and Banc of California on July 25, as both institutions attempted to stabilize amid the turmoil in the banking industry.

Rising U.S. interest rates and poor risk management were believed to be the primary reasons behind the bank’s failure, alongside the inflation surge.

READ MORE:Revealed: The Best Crypto Marketing & PR Agency

The U.S. Federal Reserve had raised its benchmark rate to 5.25% in July, the highest rate since 2007, in an attempt to tackle inflation, which reached 4.1% year-over-year in June.

As of March, Heartland Tri-State Bank held approximately $139 million in total assets and $130 million in total deposits.

Dream First Bank agreed to purchase all the assets of the failed bank, with the FDIC estimating that the cost to the Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF) would be $54.2 million.

The DIF, created in 1933 by Congress and managed by the FDIC, aims to protect deposits in the nation’s banks.

The FDIC noted that Dream First Bank’s acquisition was the least costly resolution for the DIF compared to other alternatives.

In response to the recent failures at major banks, Democrats in the House Financial Services Committee introduced several bills in June aimed at strengthening the safety and soundness of the banking system and enhancing bank executive accountability.

Representative Maxine Waters emphasized that Congress must take action to address these failures promptly.

The collapse of Heartland Tri-State Bank follows the troubled First Republic Bank’s acquisition by JPMorgan in May and the dramatic collapse of Silicon Valley Bank in March, both of which had caused significant disruptions in the U.S. banking system.

These events underscore the urgency of addressing the challenges faced by financial institutions and the need for measures to stabilize the banking sector.

Other Stories:

Why Didn’t Bitcoin (BTC) Enter a New Rally?

SEC and Binance Oppose Eeon’s Intervention in Crypto Exchange Lawsuit

3 Best Crypto Projects That Will Boom In 2023 & The Next Bull Run

Tech firms including GitHub, Hugging Face, and Creative Commons have joined forces to pen an open letter urging the European Union (EU) to revise its upcoming regulations for open-source artificial intelligence (AI) models.

The letter, addressed to policymakers, argues that subjecting upstream open-source projects to the same regulations as commercial products or deployed AI systems would hinder the development of open-source AI.

The group highlights five key suggestions to ensure that the EU’s Artificial Intelligence Act accommodates open-source models effectively.

First, they propose clearly defining AI components to avoid ambiguity in its implementation.

Second, they seek clarification that collaborative development on open-source models should not subject developers to the bill’s requirements.

Third, they advocate for researcher exceptions, allowing limited testing of open-source AI in real-world conditions. Fourth, they recommend setting proportional requirements for “foundation models.”

Open-source software, by definition, allows public access to its source code, enabling inspection, modification, and enhancement by anyone.

In the context of artificial intelligence, open-source software plays a crucial role in training and deploying models.

The European Parliament already passed the AI Act in June with a strong majority of 499 votes in favor, 28 against, and 93 abstentions.

READ MORE: Revealed: The Best Crypto Marketing & PR Agency

However, the act will become law only after reaching a consensus with the European Council, which represents 27 member states.

The subsequent step involves negotiating with individual EU members to iron out the finer details.

The open letter recognizes that the AI Act has the potential to set a global precedent in regulating AI, striking a balance between addressing risks and promoting innovation.

The signatories emphasize that the regulation should foster transparency and collaboration among diverse stakeholders.

They assert that AI requires appropriate regulation to mitigate risks, establish clear standards and oversight, and provide recourse for any resulting harms.

In conclusion, the tech firms’ open letter aims to influence the EU’s AI regulations by advocating for measures that promote open-source AI development while addressing the challenges posed by this rapidly evolving technology.

They hope to strike a balance that encourages innovation, ensures transparency, and safeguards against potential risks.

Other Stories:

3 Best Crypto Projects That Will Boom In 2023 & The Next Bull Run

SEC and Binance Oppose Eeon’s Intervention in Crypto Exchange Lawsuit

Why Didn’t Bitcoin (BTC) Enter a New Rally?

The United States Department of Justice (DOJ) is seeking the revocation of Sam Bankman-Fried’s bail, as stated in a court filing on July 28.

The accusations against him include attempting to tamper with witnesses and leaking Caroline Ellison’s diary to The New York Times.

SBF was initially released on bail on December 22, 2022, but later requested multiple modifications to his bail conditions. On January 15, 2023, he reportedly contacted the current general counsel of FTX US through email and the encrypted messaging app, Signal.

In this communication, SBF expressed a desire to reconnect and explore the possibility of establishing a constructive relationship, potentially using each other as resources or providing mutual input on various matters.

However, the DOJ alleges that SBF also used Signal for obstructive purposes, taking advantage of the app’s auto-deletion feature to complicate the investigation.

This behavior raised concerns about potential witness tampering in the eyes of the court.

READ MORE: Why Didn’t Bitcoin (BTC) Enter a New Rally?

Former U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s Office of Internet Enforcement chief, John Reed Stark, explained that Judge Lewis Kaplan has several options in response to SBF’s actions.

The judge could interpret them as attempts to improperly influence witnesses, leading to either further modifications to his bail conditions or the complete revocation of his bail.

U.S. Attorney Danielle Sassoon requested the revocation of SBF’s bail after a July 26 hearing in a Manhattan court.

The allegations against SBF include using his freedom to intimidate Caroline Ellison, his former romantic partner and colleague.

Sassoon informed the judge that SBF made approximately 100 calls to an NYT reporter in an attempt to “intimidate” Ellison.

In a separate complaint filed on July 20, the DOJ accused SBF of leaking Ellison’s diary to discredit a government witness publicly. By sharing her personal writings with a reporter, SBF allegedly aimed to undermine her credibility.

The written submission to the court followed the July 26 hearing and raised questions about whether SBF should remain free on bail.

Judge Kaplan faces a difficult decision in this case, as he must weigh the allegations against SBF and consider the potential risks posed by his actions.

Should SBF be allowed to remain free, the judge is likely to reiterate previous warnings.

Other Stories:

SEC and Binance Oppose Eeon’s Intervention in Crypto Exchange Lawsuit

Revealed: The Best Crypto Marketing & PR Agency

3 Best Crypto Projects That Will Boom In 2023 & The Next Bull Run

Worldcoin’s introduction of iris scanning to verify human identities in exchange for digital currency may seem like a plot straight out of a Black Mirror episode, but this is no fictional tale; it is a present-day project within the realm of Web3.

Worldcoin, operating on Optimism, has raised concerns about whether it contradicts the decentralized promise of Web3 by essentially centralizing biometric data.

Despite more than 2 million individuals from underserved areas already participating in this initiative to receive 25 WLD (valued at less than $100 at present) in return for sharing their biometric data, there are serious privacy risks and potential for exploitation by malicious actors.

The rationale behind Worldcoin’s creation lies in addressing the anticipated externalities of its sister company, OpenAI, which has given the world AI products like ChatGPT.

In their vision, Worldcoin aims to increase economic opportunities, establish a reliable way to differentiate humans from AI online while preserving privacy, enable global democratic processes, and potentially pave the way for AI-funded Universal Basic Income (UBI).

However, the project’s centralization by a single company raises new issues. Biometric data, particularly iris scans, is highly sensitive and can reveal intimate details about an individual, such as sex, ethnicity, and even potential medical conditions.

Granting one entity control over this data poses serious privacy concerns, as it opens the door for unauthorized monitoring and tracking of individuals without their consent.

There is also the risk of commercial exploitation, where the data could be used for targeted advertising or sold to other entities, contrary to the privacy-oriented goals many have been striving to achieve.

Moreover, centralizing biometric data makes it a tempting target for hackers and cybercriminals.

Such a “honeypot” situation could lead to massive data breaches, resulting in identity theft, fraud, and unauthorized access to the personal information of millions.

The issue goes beyond privacy and security concerns.

READ MORE: Why Didn’t Bitcoin (BTC) Enter a New Rally?

If the company possesses biometric data from foreign citizens and provides them with UBI payments, it could potentially compromise the sovereignty of countries’ democratic processes.

Governments could subpoena the data without warrants, allowing for manipulation, dissent suppression, and surveillance on an unprecedented scale.

When individuals visit Worldcoin’s Orbs for iris scanning, they are handed a sticker proclaiming them as “Verified Human.”

This portrayal of personhood as a mere human in a vast biometric database raises discomforting questions about the erosion of personal identity and the consequences of selling one’s data to a cryptocurrency project with connections to AI development.

In conclusion, while Worldcoin may have noble intentions, the potential risks and consequences of centralizing biometric data for financial gains raise valid concerns.

It is essential to strike a balance between technological advancement and safeguarding individual privacy and sovereignty in the digital age.

Sometimes, reality can be more unsettling than fiction, and it is crucial to carefully consider the implications of such projects on society as a whole.

Other Stories:

Revealed: The Best Crypto Marketing & PR Agency

SEC and Binance Oppose Eeon’s Intervention in Crypto Exchange Lawsuit

3 Best Crypto Projects That Will Boom In 2023 & The Next Bull Run