The European Commission’s proposal for the Artificial Intelligence Act (AI Act) has undergone extensive negotiations between the Council of the European Union and the European Parliament.
However, the two legislative bodies face challenges due to differences on specific issues, including biometric surveillance.
In Germany, political groups and digital experts are raising concerns about the proposed changes to the AI Act.
Die Linke, a left-wing party in Germany, is calling for stricter regulation and transparency in European AI legislation.
They emphasize the need for consumer protection and want high-risk AI systems to be thoroughly checked by a supervisory authority before being launched on the market.
Die Linke also advocates for an explicit ban on biometric identification systems in public spaces and AI-driven election interference, among other measures.
On the other hand, the center-right coalition, known as “the Union,” prioritizes fostering innovation and openness in AI.
They believe that excessive regulation should be avoided and emphasize the importance of aligning with existing data protection and digital market regulations.
READ MORE: Tennessee Realtor Couple Charged in $6M ‘Blessings of God Thru Crypto’ Investment Fraud
The German AI Association (KI Bundesverband), representing innovative SMEs and startups, also advocates for openness to innovation but disagrees with the EU’s approach.
The association suggests a focus on mitigating real AI application threats and risks and protecting fundamental rights and European values.
Germany’s government supports the AI Act but aims to strike a balance between regulation and openness to innovation. They are implementing measures to promote German AI companies and continue advocating for an ambitious approach to AI testbeds during negotiations on the AI Act.
Despite these efforts, concerns arise that Europe might fall behind in AI compared to the dominance of U.S. and Chinese tech companies.
A feasibility study commissioned by the German Ministry for Economic Affairs and Climate Action explores the potential of large AI models for Germany, including the establishment of an AI supercomputing infrastructure to foster development.
Experts argue that Europe’s reliance on non-European software and services threatens its AI sovereignty.
They propose the creation of a globally recognized “CERN for AI” to facilitate cutting-edge research and attract talent, contributing to the success of “AI made in Europe.”
In conclusion, the negotiations on the AI Act continue to be complex due to differing perspectives. While Die Linke advocates for stricter regulation, the Union seeks to prioritize innovation.
Germany’s government is working to strike a balance between regulation and innovation, and the German AI Association calls for practical solutions to address AI risks.
To avoid falling behind, Europe must focus on fostering its AI landscape and investing in foundational technologies.
A shift in AI strategy and targeted public investments are essential for the success of “AI made in Europe.”
Other Stories:
Ripple’s Chief Legal Officer Dismisses Concerns of SEC Appeal, Predicts Further Victory
Best Crypto Projects to Invest in For The Next Bull Run
KuCoin Denies Layoff Rumors Amidst Crypto Industry Stabilization
