Binance CEO Changpeng “CZ” Zhao is planning to introduce smaller algorithmic stablecoins to provide investors with alternatives to the existing dominant stablecoin giants in the market.
During a recent Twitter “ask me anything” (AMA) session on July 31, CZ expressed concerns about the risks associated with large stablecoins like Tether (USDT) and Binance USD (BUSD).
He highlighted the lack of transparency with Tether, which is the largest stablecoin by market cap, as there have been no audit reports available to verify its reserves.
Even supposedly well-regulated stablecoins like Binance USD come with unforeseeable risks, as evidenced by Paxos Trust Company’s termination of its partnership with Binance and the New York Department of Financial Services’ order to cease minting new BUSD stablecoins.
To mitigate these risks, CZ revealed that Binance is actively working on developing algorithmic stablecoins.
Additionally, the company aims to diversify its stablecoin partnerships to spread potential risk across multiple assets. CZ emphasized the importance of not placing all their bets on a single stablecoin, given the inherent risks involved.
Binance has plans to launch the First Digital USD in Hong Kong and is exploring new stablecoin options in Europe.
First Digital USD is a programmable stablecoin pegged to the U.S. dollar and managed by First Digital Group, licensed in Hong Kong. It was recently listed on the Binance platform.
However, Binance is facing regulatory uncertainty, as evidenced by the $1 billion lawsuit brought against CZ and the company by the Commodities Futures Trading Commission, which CZ seeks to dismiss, alleging overreach of jurisdiction.
READ MORE: SEC Chairman Gary Gensler Raises Alarm Over Widespread Fraud in Crypto Market
Additionally, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission filed a lawsuit against Binance, CZ, and affiliated entities on June 5, accusing them of involvement in the sale of unregistered securities, fraud, and conflicts of interest.
In conclusion, CZ’s strategy to introduce smaller algorithmic stablecoins and diversify stablecoin partnerships aims to offer investors more options and reduce potential risks associated with dominant stablecoins in the market.
Despite facing regulatory challenges, Binance is forging ahead with its stablecoin initiatives and expansion plans into different regions.
Other Stories:
Liquid Staking Tokens Poised to Dethrone Ethereum’s Ether (ETH) as Dominant DeFi Asset
Bitcoin’s Reduced Volatility Sparks Anticipation for Exciting Long-Term Bull Signal
The Nigerian Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has issued a warning to local investors regarding the use of Binance, one of the world’s largest cryptocurrency exchanges.
This cautionary measure comes as a response to a previous circular issued against a fraudulent company that was illegally using the Binance brand.
On July 28, the SEC released a statement advising against investing with Binance, citing the absence of a valid license for operations in the country, thereby rendering its activities illegal.
The commission also emphasized the substantial risks associated with investing in cryptocurrencies, highlighting the potential for significant financial losses:
“Any member of the investing public dealing with the entity, making such solicitation is doing so at his/her own risk.”
This is not the first time the SEC has taken action against Binance.
In June, the commission published a similar circular, limiting the activities of Binance Nigeria, which was proven to be a fraudulent entity unaffiliated with the legitimate Binance exchange.
In response, Binance issued a cease and desist notice to Binance Nigeria.
READ MORE: SEC Chairman Gary Gensler Raises Alarm Over Widespread Fraud in Crypto Market
It’s worth noting that Nigeria has maintained a cautious approach to the crypto industry, despite its efforts to promote the central bank digital currency (CBDC), known as the eNaira, which was launched in 2021.
However, adoption rates of the eNaira have fallen below expectations, leading the central bank to explore options to boost its usage.
In July, the CBDC system was upgraded with near-field communication technology, enabling more convenient and secure contactless payments.
Furthermore, starting from May 2023, Nigeria implemented a 10% tax on gains from the sale of digital assets, including cryptocurrencies.
Local stakeholders criticized this measure as “premature.”
Cointelegraph sought further commentary from Binance regarding the SEC notice, but no additional statements have been provided at this time.
As for Binance and other unregistered platforms, the SEC demands an immediate cessation of services in Nigeria.
The regulatory body is determined to safeguard local investors and uphold the legality of financial activities within the country’s borders.
Other Stories:
Liquid Staking Tokens Poised to Dethrone Ethereum’s Ether (ETH) as Dominant DeFi Asset
Bitcoin’s Reduced Volatility Sparks Anticipation for Exciting Long-Term Bull Signal
ConsenSys, a blockchain technology firm, has publicly launched its “Diligence Fuzzing” tool for smart contract testing, as revealed in an announcement on August 1.
This new tool is designed to identify vulnerabilities in contracts before they are deployed by generating “random and invalid data points.”
The release comes in the wake of significant losses in decentralized finance hacks, which surpassed $2.8 billion in 2022.
The escalating financial implications of these hacks have prompted developers to seek more sophisticated testing tools to proactively discover vulnerabilities before malicious attackers do.
Previously available as a closed beta version with access approval requirements, ConsenSys has now made Diligence Fuzzing accessible to all developers without any restrictions.
Additionally, the tool has been integrated with the smart contract toolkit Foundry, and developers can test it out for free before committing to any expenses.
Liz Daldalian, the lead of ConsenSys security services, elaborated on the functioning of the tool in an interview with Cointelegraph.
Developers can utilize “Scribble,” a machine language developed by ConsenSys, to annotate their contracts.
READ MORE:SEC Chairman Gary Gensler Raises Alarm Over Widespread Fraud in Crypto Market
These annotations allow the fuzzing tool to comprehend the contract’s logic and generate “unexpected” inputs to test whether the contract produces unintended actions under various scenarios.
The ConsenSys security researcher, Gonçalo Sá, clarified that Diligence Fuzzing is not a “black box fuzzer,” meaning it doesn’t employ completely random data.
Instead, it functions as a “grey-box fuzzer” that leverages an understanding of the contract’s current state to optimize the data produced and enhance the tool’s efficiency.
Sá observed an increasing interest in fuzzing among developers, particularly with the growing popularity of Foundry’s default black-box fuzzer.
Many users, however, seek a more sophisticated fuzzer than the default one, which Diligence Fuzzer aims to provide.
Sá emphasized that people are recognizing the power of fuzzing and are seeking more potent tools to fortify their security measures.
Smart contract hacks remain a persistent issue for users, with Web3 security vulnerabilities resulting in over $471.43 million in losses during the first half of 2023, excluding rug pulls and phishing scams.
While Diligence Fuzzing is not a foolproof solution to eradicate all smart contract hacks, Daldalian asserted that it represents one essential tool in developers’ arsenal to create more secure smart contracts.
By adopting such tools, the Web3 community can take significant strides towards mitigating losses from these attacks.
Other Stories:
Bitcoin’s Reduced Volatility Sparks Anticipation for Exciting Long-Term Bull Signal
Liquid Staking Tokens Poised to Dethrone Ethereum’s Ether (ETH) as Dominant DeFi Asset
The Bank of Korea has reportedly shortlisted three regions, excluding Seoul, for conducting a trial of its central bank digital currency (CBDC), as stated by a local South Korean media outlet.
The chosen locations are Jeju, Busan, and Incheon, which have been designated as potential “private target CBDC test beds.”
The bank’s long-term plan involves selecting one of these regions to experiment with payments and distribution on a public scale, aiming to secure franchises that can accept CBDC payments.
This move is expected to enable not only local residents but also tourists and civilians to participate in CBDC transactions through the CBDC electronic wallet app.
The Bank of Korea has mentioned that the regional closed tests for the CBDC will follow a similar pattern to the current local currency scheme that has been implemented in different parts of South Korea.
This local currency scheme was introduced during the COVID-19 pandemic to address basic income and relief payments.
Notably, the regions shortlisted for the pilot—Jeju, Busan, and Incheon—all currently issue and distribute their own local currencies such as “Tamranjeon,” “Dongbaekjeon,” and “Incheon e-Eum,” respectively.
An official from a commercial bank in Korea has revealed that Busan, due to its large population of eligible citizens, poses challenges for the Bank of Korea.
READ MORE: SEC Suffers Setback as Court Overturns Ruling on SPIKES Index Securities Classification
Consequently, the selection appears to be leaning towards Jeju, which has the second-largest population.
Comparatively, the local currency scheme presents fewer “technical barriers” in contrast to CBDCs, as reported by the local media.
This observation highlights the importance of conducting trials in different regions to identify potential hurdles and find effective solutions for a nationwide rollout of the CBDC.
Furthermore, various banks in South Korea have expressed interest in stablecoins as potential alternatives to CBDCs, aiming to enhance operational efficiency.
In summary, the Bank of Korea’s decision to narrow down its CBDC pilot to Jeju, Busan, and Incheon reflects the strategic approach towards testing and refining the digital currency.
By conducting regional closed tests, the bank aims to gain valuable insights and establish a robust system for CBDC adoption in the future.
The initiative aligns with the growing interest in exploring alternative payment methods, emphasizing the country’s commitment to staying at the forefront of financial innovation.
Other Stories:
Tech Firms Call on European Union to Support Open-Source AI in New Regulations
Blockchain Could Save Financial Institutions $10 Billion by 2030: Ripple-FPC Report
Margot Robbie’s Comparison of Bitcoin to Ken from Barbie Ignites Debate
The Curve Finance exploit that occurred recently resulted in one of the largest ever maximal extractable value (MEV) reward blocks, totaling 584.05 Ether (ETH).
Ethereum core developer, known as “eric.eth,” reported on July 31 that the day had witnessed some of the most substantial MEV reward blocks in the history of Ethereum, all of which were caused by the exploitation of Curve Finance stable pools on July 30.
However, it’s worth noting that a larger MEV reward block of 692 ETH was recorded back in March.
MEV bots are responsible for generating additional revenue by reordering or inserting transactions within a regular block, effectively creating arbitrage opportunities.
These bots can also identify pending liquidation transactions and front-run them, purchasing the liquidated assets at discounted prices.
To carry out such actions, MEV bots pay a considerable amount of ETH to the block producer to secure a position at the front of the transaction line.
Validators propose a block using a relay, outsourcing block production to specialized entities that extract this extra revenue.
In return for allowing MEV bots to front-run transactions, validators receive a share of the generated revenue, commonly known as the “block reward.”
One of the highest MEV bot block rewards amounted to 584.05 ETH, approximately valued at $1 million. This reward was confirmed at 1.34 am UTC on July 31, according to Beaconcha.in.
There were also other notable block rewards of 345 ETH and 247 ETH around the same time.
READ MORE: Pro-XRP Lawyer Alleges SEC’s Actions Driven by Safeguarding Corporate Capitalism
In response to the news, moral concerns were raised regarding the implications of potentially illicit funds being used to pay validators, allowing for the front-running of transactions.
Some individuals questioned the ethics of MEV rewards going to miners, particularly when these rewards are essentially sourced from hacked funds.
Prior instances have shown how MEV exploitation can lead to significant profits.
For example, in April, a Subway-themed trading bot leveraged “sandwich attacks” during the memecoin trading frenzy, making millions in extractable value.
These recent developments in the MEV landscape have sparked discussions about the ethical considerations surrounding such practices and how they may affect the overall integrity and trustworthiness of blockchain ecosystems.
Other Stories:
Worldcoin’s Iris Scanning Project Raises Privacy and Sovereignty Concern
French Data Protection Agency Investigates Worldcoin
Kyrgyzstan Expands Cryptocurrency Mining with Government Backing at Hydro Power Plant
Coinbase, the prominent cryptocurrency exchange, was reportedly urged by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to remove all cryptocurrencies from its platform, except for Bitcoin (BTC).
This revelation came to light during a recent interview with Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong published by the Financial Times on July 31.
According to Armstrong, the SEC demanded the delisting of nearly 250 tokens on Coinbase before initiating legal action against the exchange.
The SEC’s stance was based on its belief that “every asset other than Bitcoin is a security.”
However, Armstrong disagreed with this interpretation, challenging the regulator to explain their reasoning, but they refused, insisting on the complete removal of all tokens besides Bitcoin.
This viewpoint aligns with SEC Chair Gary Gensler’s assertion made in a prior interview that everything apart from Bitcoin falls under the agency’s regulatory purview as a security.
Agreeing to the SEC’s request, Armstrong argued, would have set a dangerous precedent and potentially led to the demise of the entire crypto industry in the United States.
As a result, Coinbase opted to challenge the SEC’s position in court to seek legal clarity.
READ MORE: French Data Protection Agency Investigates Worldcoin
The SEC filed a lawsuit against Coinbase in early June, accusing the exchange of operating without proper registration and identifying 13 cryptocurrencies offered on the platform as unregistered securities.
Coincidentally, the regulator also lodged a similar complaint against Binance.
Responding to the situation, the SEC clarified that while its enforcement division does not formally request companies to delist crypto assets, its staff may share their views on actions that might breach securities laws.
Regulation of the crypto industry in the United States has been somewhat ambiguous, with both the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and the SEC exercising regulatory authority over various aspects of the sector.
To address this regulatory uncertainty, legislation aiming to grant primary jurisdiction over cryptocurrencies to the CFTC and define the SEC’s role concerning crypto was passed by the House Agricultural Committee on July 27, following earlier approval by the House Financial Services Committee.
However, further steps are required for it to become law.
In summary, Coinbase’s confrontation with the SEC regarding the delisting of cryptocurrencies other than Bitcoin reflects the ongoing struggle to establish clear and comprehensive regulations for the crypto industry in the United States.
The outcome of this legal battle could have significant implications for the entire crypto market in the country.
Other Stories:
Pro-XRP Lawyer Alleges SEC’s Actions Driven by Safeguarding Corporate Capitalism
Kyrgyzstan Expands Cryptocurrency Mining with Government Backing at Hydro Power Plant
Worldcoin’s Iris Scanning Project Raises Privacy and Sovereignty Concern
In a recent hacking incident involving the decentralized finance (DeFi) protocol, Curve Finance, an ethical hacker successfully reclaimed approximately 2,879 Ether (ETH), equivalent to around $5.4 million, from a hacker.
Curve Finance experienced an exploit of several stablepools due to malfunctioning reentrancy locks in certain versions of the Vyper programming language on July 30.
The damages Curve Finance faced are speculated to be around $47 million.
Simultaneously, other DeFi protocols that were utilizing the susceptible versions of Vyper were exploited as well, posing a significant challenge to the DeFi ecosystem.
Identified as “c0ffeebabe.eth”, an operator of a maximal extractable value bot, used a front-running bot against the malevolent hacker, securing nearly 3,000 ETH. These reclaimed funds were returned to the Curve deployer address, the expected rightful holder.
READ MORE: SEC Suffers Setback as Court Overturns Ruling on SPIKES Index Securities Classification
In the aftermath of this incident, fraudulent refund schemes are being propagated on Twitter.
Impersonators of Curve Finance and victims of the hack are advocating a counterfeit refund scheme, aiming at those who already suffered losses due to the hack. Curve Finance’s official account has yet to discuss a refund plan.
Simultaneously, BNB Smart Chain has encountered similar attacks due to the Vyper vulnerability, as shared by BlockSec, a blockchain security firm. An approximate amount of $73,000 was stolen in three different exploits.
In related news, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has enforced new regulations for cybersecurity incidents involving publicly-traded U.S. companies.
These rules mandate disclosure of a cyberattack four days after it’s deemed “material” and also periodic reporting on policies to manage and identify cybersecurity risks.
Other Stories:
Tech Firms Call on European Union to Support Open-Source AI in New Regulations
Blockchain Could Save Financial Institutions $10 Billion by 2030: Ripple-FPC Report
Margot Robbie’s Comparison of Bitcoin to Ken from Barbie Ignites Debate
The Korea Financial Intelligence Unit (KoFIU) urged the country’s crypto industry to intensify their efforts in combatting illegal activities during a meeting held on Thursday.
KoFIU Commissioner Rhee Yunsu announced the establishment of a dedicated “strategic analysis team” focused on crypto-related crimes.
The team aims to enhance systematic identification and analysis of illicit activities in the crypto sector, enabling KoFIU to provide more valuable data to law enforcement and investigators, as stated by South Korea’s Financial Services Commission.
During the meeting, KoFIU stressed the need for the industry to bolster its compliance capacity and enhance its response to illegal activities.
READ MORE: Why Didn’t Bitcoin (BTC) Enter a New Rally?
Five prominent companies from South Korea’s crypto industry, including local crypto exchanges Upbit and Bithumb, were present at the gathering.
Coincidentally, the meeting took place just one day after the South Korean government formed an interagency investigation unit specifically targeting crypto crimes.
The joint unit, operating from the Seoul Southern District Prosecutors’ Office, comprises 30 investigators from agencies such as the Prosecutor’s Office, the Financial Supervisory Service, the National Tax Service, and the Korea Customs Service.
Traditionally a crucial market for cryptocurrencies with significant investor interest and numerous crypto companies, South Korea’s authorities have recently adopted a tougher stance towards the industry.
In response to concerns over potential misconduct, prosecutors had previously conducted raids on the offices of Bithumb, alleging price manipulation in the crypto market.
Additionally, the country took action against Do Kwon, the founder of Terra and a Korean national, who was found guilty of attempting to leave the country using a forged passport.
Presently, Do Kwon is in custody in Montenegro due to the legal actions taken against him.
In light of the evolving regulatory landscape and the growing importance of the crypto market in South Korea, both KoFIU and the newly formed joint crypto crime unit are determined to ensure the industry operates with integrity and transparency.
By intensifying efforts to prevent illegal activities, they aim to maintain a secure and reputable environment for crypto-related businesses and investors in the country.
Other Stories:
Revealed: The Best Crypto Marketing & PR Agency
3 Best Crypto Projects That Will Boom In 2023 & The Next Bull Run
Tech firms including GitHub, Hugging Face, and Creative Commons have joined forces to pen an open letter urging the European Union (EU) to revise its upcoming regulations for open-source artificial intelligence (AI) models.
The letter, addressed to policymakers, argues that subjecting upstream open-source projects to the same regulations as commercial products or deployed AI systems would hinder the development of open-source AI.
The group highlights five key suggestions to ensure that the EU’s Artificial Intelligence Act accommodates open-source models effectively.
First, they propose clearly defining AI components to avoid ambiguity in its implementation.
Second, they seek clarification that collaborative development on open-source models should not subject developers to the bill’s requirements.
Third, they advocate for researcher exceptions, allowing limited testing of open-source AI in real-world conditions. Fourth, they recommend setting proportional requirements for “foundation models.”
Open-source software, by definition, allows public access to its source code, enabling inspection, modification, and enhancement by anyone.
In the context of artificial intelligence, open-source software plays a crucial role in training and deploying models.
The European Parliament already passed the AI Act in June with a strong majority of 499 votes in favor, 28 against, and 93 abstentions.
READ MORE: Revealed: The Best Crypto Marketing & PR Agency
However, the act will become law only after reaching a consensus with the European Council, which represents 27 member states.
The subsequent step involves negotiating with individual EU members to iron out the finer details.
The open letter recognizes that the AI Act has the potential to set a global precedent in regulating AI, striking a balance between addressing risks and promoting innovation.
The signatories emphasize that the regulation should foster transparency and collaboration among diverse stakeholders.
They assert that AI requires appropriate regulation to mitigate risks, establish clear standards and oversight, and provide recourse for any resulting harms.
In conclusion, the tech firms’ open letter aims to influence the EU’s AI regulations by advocating for measures that promote open-source AI development while addressing the challenges posed by this rapidly evolving technology.
They hope to strike a balance that encourages innovation, ensures transparency, and safeguards against potential risks.
Other Stories:
3 Best Crypto Projects That Will Boom In 2023 & The Next Bull Run
SEC and Binance Oppose Eeon’s Intervention in Crypto Exchange Lawsuit
The United States Department of Justice (DOJ) is seeking the revocation of Sam Bankman-Fried’s bail, as stated in a court filing on July 28.
The accusations against him include attempting to tamper with witnesses and leaking Caroline Ellison’s diary to The New York Times.
SBF was initially released on bail on December 22, 2022, but later requested multiple modifications to his bail conditions. On January 15, 2023, he reportedly contacted the current general counsel of FTX US through email and the encrypted messaging app, Signal.
In this communication, SBF expressed a desire to reconnect and explore the possibility of establishing a constructive relationship, potentially using each other as resources or providing mutual input on various matters.
However, the DOJ alleges that SBF also used Signal for obstructive purposes, taking advantage of the app’s auto-deletion feature to complicate the investigation.
This behavior raised concerns about potential witness tampering in the eyes of the court.
READ MORE: Why Didn’t Bitcoin (BTC) Enter a New Rally?
Former U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s Office of Internet Enforcement chief, John Reed Stark, explained that Judge Lewis Kaplan has several options in response to SBF’s actions.
The judge could interpret them as attempts to improperly influence witnesses, leading to either further modifications to his bail conditions or the complete revocation of his bail.
U.S. Attorney Danielle Sassoon requested the revocation of SBF’s bail after a July 26 hearing in a Manhattan court.
The allegations against SBF include using his freedom to intimidate Caroline Ellison, his former romantic partner and colleague.
Sassoon informed the judge that SBF made approximately 100 calls to an NYT reporter in an attempt to “intimidate” Ellison.
In a separate complaint filed on July 20, the DOJ accused SBF of leaking Ellison’s diary to discredit a government witness publicly. By sharing her personal writings with a reporter, SBF allegedly aimed to undermine her credibility.
The written submission to the court followed the July 26 hearing and raised questions about whether SBF should remain free on bail.
Judge Kaplan faces a difficult decision in this case, as he must weigh the allegations against SBF and consider the potential risks posed by his actions.
Should SBF be allowed to remain free, the judge is likely to reiterate previous warnings.
Other Stories:
SEC and Binance Oppose Eeon’s Intervention in Crypto Exchange Lawsuit
Revealed: The Best Crypto Marketing & PR Agency
3 Best Crypto Projects That Will Boom In 2023 & The Next Bull Run